Skip to main content
Back
May 2, 2026

Trader Joe's $7.4 Million FACTA Settlement for Credit Card Receipt Data Digits

Settlement Image

The Trader Joe's $7.4 Million FACTA Settlement for Credit Card Receipt Data Digits settlement offers $7.40M in total, with individual payouts of $56 to $113 to eligible claimants who be a member of the settlement class, meaning you had unique credit/debit card numbers used for purchases at trader joe’s during the class period (march 5, 2019–july 19, 2019).. The deadline to file is June 9, 2026. Proof of purchase is not required.

Deadline
29 days remaining

Deadline: June 9, 2026

Total Settlement Amount
$7.40M

Total amount allocated for all claims

Individual Payout Range
$56 to $113

Estimated amount per eligible claim

Proof of Purchase
Not Required

No proof of purchase needed — anyone eligible can file a claim

No proof of identity theft is required. The claim generally relies on providing the Class ID/Claim ID for online and IVR submissions; if filing by mail, a Class ID/Claim ID may not be required initially, but the settlement administrator may contact you to validate eligibility.

Settlement Summary

Between March 5, 2019, and July 19, 2019, a class of Trader Joe’s shoppers alleged that the company violated the federal Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA). FACTA generally limits what merchants can print on receipts—specifically, it prohibits printing more than the last five digits of a credit or debit card number, with certain formatting requirements. The lawsuit claimed that Trader Joe’s receipts instead displayed additional digits (the first six and the last four), potentially increasing the risk that card information could be misused if receipts were exposed. The case—Keim v. Trader Joe’s Company (Los Angeles County Superior Court, No. 19STCV36790)—was filed as a “FACTA receipt truncation” class action and is significant because it focuses on a statutory violation even without requiring proof of identity theft. The proposed settlement totals $7.4 million (non-reversionary), with an estimated payout of about $56 to $113 per eligible class member (roughly $102 on average) for a class of 757,663 unique card numbers; attorneys’ fees and a service award are also included in the settlement structure. More broadly, this kind of digit-display litigation fits a long-running pattern of FACTA cases across retail and hospitality, and it reflects how merchants’ receipt-printing practices can trigger liability under consumer credit-protection rules—ultimately underscoring the need for retailers to ensure compliant receipt formatting and data-handling controls.

Entities Involved

Trader Joe’s Company
Keim v. Trader Joe’s Company
Los Angeles County Superior Court
Judge Elaine Lu
Brian Keim
Keogh Law Ltd
Hekmat Law Group
Scott D. Owens P.A.
Verita Global, LLC
Identity Theft Resource Center (ITRC)
Trader Joe’s insurer
Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA)
15 U.S.C. § 1681c(g)
TJ-FACTASettlement.com

Related Topics

Trader Joe's FACTA settlement
FACTA credit card receipt settlement
credit card receipt digits class action
Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act lawsuit
TJ FACTA settlement $7.4 million
Verita Global claims administrator
Keim v. Trader Joe's FACTA
class action settlement eligible cardholders
electronic deposit settlement payment
paper check settlement option
credit debit card receipt printing class action
no identity theft required FACTA
Los Angeles County Superior Court 19STCV36790
Trader Joe's privacy class action

Eligibility Requirements

  • Be a member of the settlement class, meaning you had unique credit/debit card numbers used for purchases at Trader Joe’s during the class period (March 5, 2019–July 19, 2019).
  • Submit a valid claim (online/IVR or by mail) through the settlement website or claims portal by the claim deadline (June 9, 2026).
  • Provide the required Class ID/Claim ID for online and IVR claims (mail claims may be accepted without it, though the administrator may follow up to confirm eligibility).

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest settlement updates and news.

Important Notice About Filing Claims

Submitting false information in a settlement claim is considered perjury and will result in your claim being rejected. Fraudulent claims harm legitimate class members and may result in legal consequences.

If you are unsure about your eligibility for this settlement, please visit the official settlement administrator’s website using the link provided above. Review the eligibility criteria carefully before submitting a claim.

Class Action Champion is an independent information resource and is not affiliated with any settlement administrator, law firm, or court. We provide settlement information as a service to help connect eligible class members with legitimate settlements.

Related Settlements

Anne Arundel Dermatology Data Breach Settlement $2.4 Million for Patient Info Security Claims

Anne Arundel Dermatology P.A. agreed to pay a $2.4 million settlement to resolve allegations that a data breach exposed patients’ personal and health information. The incident occurred between Feb. 14, 2025, and May 13, 2025. Eligible class members are people in the U.S. who provided or whose information the clinic collected, received, or possessed on or before Dec. 9, 2025.

Absolute Dental Group $3.3 Million Settlement for 2025 Data Breach Losses

Absolute Dental Group LLC agreed to pay a $3.3 million class action settlement over a potential 2025 data breach affecting consumers’ personal information. The incident occurred between Feb. 19, 2025 and March 5, 2025, when unauthorized access may have exposed data. Eligible U.S. residents who received notice from Absolute Dental about the incident may claim up to $5,000 for documented losses and may also receive a pro rata cash payment, with certain California residents eligible for an enhanced amount.

Travelers PIP Settlement for New Jersey Claims Up to 70 or More for Deductible Reductions

A class action settlement totaling at least the net settlement fund (with attorneys’ fees up to $275,000 and service awards of $7,500) resolves allegations that Travelers and St. Paul improperly reduced New Jersey PIP coverage limits by counting deductibles and copayments, causing some insureds to receive less than the PIP benefits available. Eligible policyholders (and certain heirs/representatives) who received final PIP payments between April 14, 2017 and April 1, 2023 that were within $3,000 of their policy limit—but not the full limit—may receive an automatic $70 and possibly additional compensation.

MUBI $1.6 Million Settlement for California Auto-Renewal Without Notice

California subscribers of the MUBI streaming service may be eligible for a $1.6 million class action settlement over alleged auto-renewal charges without adequate notice or proper consent. The claims cover sign-ups beginning April 1, 2021 and auto-renewals occurring through May 31, 2025, as described in Cesar Cejudo v. MUBI, Inc. To be eligible, claimants must have been California residents whose subscription renewed at least once and who did not receive a full refund of renewal charges.