Skip to main content
Back
Apr 25, 2026

MUBI $1.6 Million Settlement for California Auto-Renewal Without Notice

Settlement Image

The MUBI $1.6 Million Settlement for California Auto-Renewal Without Notice settlement offers $1.60M in total to eligible claimants who you were a resident of california. The deadline to file is June 9, 2026. Proof of purchase is not required.

Deadline
10 days remaining

Deadline: June 9, 2026

Total Settlement Amount
$1.60M

Total amount allocated for all claims

Individual Payout Range
TBD

Estimated amount per eligible claim

Proof of Purchase
Not Required

No proof of purchase needed — anyone eligible can file a claim

No proof is required upfront. To claim payment, the claimant must submit a claim form and attest under penalty of perjury that they are a class member—i.e., a California resident whose MUBI subscription was auto-renewed during the class period and who did not receive a full refund of the renewal charges. The information provided must be true and correct to the claimant’s knowledge.

Settlement Summary

This class action settlement involves MUBI, a curated streaming service that markets films and series with a boutique, “quality-over-quantity” lineup, often priced around $10 to $15 per month. The lawsuit—Cesar Cejudo v. MUBI, Inc. (No. 5:25-CV-03652-BLF) in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California—alleges that MUBI renewed certain California subscriptions automatically without giving “clear and conspicuous” notice and without obtaining the affirmative consent California law requires before charging consumers for renewal periods. For qualifying California subscribers, the proposed $1.6 million settlement (with claims due by June 9, 2026) is meant to compensate people who were auto-renewed at least once between April 1, 2021 and May 31, 2025 and did not receive a full refund of those renewal charges; proof isn’t required at the initial claim stage because eligibility is based on a sworn attestation. MUBI denies wrongdoing but agreed to settle to avoid the expense and uncertainty of trial, making the agreement significant for consumers who may not have realized their subscription would continue billing. The broader implication is that subscription “auto-renewal” practices—common in streaming, software, and membership businesses—are tightly scrutinized in California and can trigger liability when disclosures are buried, unclear, or fail to secure proper consent. This case fits into a wider pattern of class actions targeting alleged violations of California’s consumer protection framework, including the state’s Automatic Renewal Law as enforced through the False Advertising Law and Unfair Competition Law; similar lawsuits have argued that companies must clearly explain renewal terms before charging and must get affirmative permission rather than relying on implied authorization. Industry-wide, these requirements push businesses to tighten checkout and renewal messaging, improve user controls over billing, and document consent flows; in this settlement, notice and administration costs will be deducted from the fund, and payments are available only to eligible claimants who submit by the deadline.

Entities Involved

MUBI, Inc.
Cesar Cejudo
Cejudo v. MUBI, Inc. (Case No. 5:25-CV-03652-BLF)
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Judge Beth Labson Freeman
Dovel & Luner LLP
Kroll Settlement Administration
Kroll Settlement Administration PO Box 225391 New York, NY 10150-5391
MubiSettlement.com
Netflix
A24-style films
False Advertising Law (California)
Unfair Competition Law (California)
Automatic Renewal Law (California)

Related Topics

MUBI class action settlement
MUBI auto renewal notice California
MUBI settlement 1.6 million
Cesar Cejudo v. MUBI
automatic renewal lawsuit California
MUBI subscription charged without notice
California subscription auto-renewal refund
False Advertising Law auto-renewal
Unfair Competition Law settlement
MubiSettlement.com claim
Kroll settlement administration MUBI
how to file a MUBI claim
MUBI class action claim deadline June 9 2026
California MUBI subscribers eligible

Eligibility Requirements

  • You were a resident of California
  • You signed up for a MUBI subscription on or after April 1, 2021
  • Your MUBI subscription was renewed at least once between April 1, 2021 and May 31, 2025
  • You did not receive a refund from MUBI of all renewal charges
  • You did not validly opt out (opt-outs are excluded from the class)

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest settlement updates and news.

Important Notice About Filing Claims

Submitting false information in a settlement claim is considered perjury and will result in your claim being rejected. Fraudulent claims harm legitimate class members and may result in legal consequences.

If you are unsure about your eligibility for this settlement, please visit the official settlement administrator’s website using the link provided above. Review the eligibility criteria carefully before submitting a claim.

Class Action Champion is an independent information resource and is not affiliated with any settlement administrator, law firm, or court. We provide settlement information as a service to help connect eligible class members with legitimate settlements.

Related Settlements

Anne Arundel Dermatology Data Breach Settlement $2.4 Million for Patient Info Security Claims

Anne Arundel Dermatology P.A. agreed to pay a $2.4 million settlement to resolve allegations that a data breach exposed patients’ personal and health information. The incident occurred between Feb. 14, 2025, and May 13, 2025. Eligible class members are people in the U.S. who provided or whose information the clinic collected, received, or possessed on or before Dec. 9, 2025.

Absolute Dental Group $3.3 Million Settlement for 2025 Data Breach Losses

Absolute Dental Group LLC agreed to pay a $3.3 million class action settlement over a potential 2025 data breach affecting consumers’ personal information. The incident occurred between Feb. 19, 2025 and March 5, 2025, when unauthorized access may have exposed data. Eligible U.S. residents who received notice from Absolute Dental about the incident may claim up to $5,000 for documented losses and may also receive a pro rata cash payment, with certain California residents eligible for an enhanced amount.

Travelers PIP Settlement for New Jersey Claims Up to 70 or More for Deductible Reductions

A class action settlement totaling at least the net settlement fund (with attorneys’ fees up to $275,000 and service awards of $7,500) resolves allegations that Travelers and St. Paul improperly reduced New Jersey PIP coverage limits by counting deductibles and copayments, causing some insureds to receive less than the PIP benefits available. Eligible policyholders (and certain heirs/representatives) who received final PIP payments between April 14, 2017 and April 1, 2023 that were within $3,000 of their policy limit—but not the full limit—may receive an automatic $70 and possibly additional compensation.

MetLife $1.2 Million Settlement for Underinsured Motorist Coverage Offsets in New Mexico

Metropolitan Direct Property and Casualty Insurance Co. (MetLife) agreed to pay $1.2 million to settle claims that it misrepresented or failed to disclose underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) coverage limits and used improper offsets. The issue relates to New Mexico auto insurance activity between Oct. 1, 2010, and Jan. 31, 2022. Eligible class members include qualifying policyholders who had UM/UIM claim offsets by at-fault payments or who purchased UM/UIM coverage in that period.