Skip to main content
Back
Apr 11, 2026

MUBI $1.6 Million Settlement for California Auto-Renewal Without Notice

Settlement Image

The MUBI $1.6 Million Settlement for California Auto-Renewal Without Notice settlement offers $1.60M in total to eligible claimants who you were a resident of california. The deadline to file is June 9, 2026. Proof of purchase is not required.

Deadline
55 days remaining

Deadline: June 9, 2026

Total Settlement Amount
$1.60M

Total amount allocated for all claims

Individual Payout Range
TBD

Estimated amount per eligible claim

Proof of Purchase
Not Required

No proof of purchase needed — anyone eligible can file a claim

No proof is required upfront. To claim payment, the claimant must submit a claim form and attest under penalty of perjury that they are a class member—i.e., a California resident whose MUBI subscription was auto-renewed during the class period and who did not receive a full refund of the renewal charges. The information provided must be true and correct to the claimant’s knowledge.

Settlement Summary

This class action settlement involves MUBI, a curated streaming service that markets films and series with a boutique, “quality-over-quantity” lineup, often priced around $10 to $15 per month. The lawsuit—Cesar Cejudo v. MUBI, Inc. (No. 5:25-CV-03652-BLF) in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California—alleges that MUBI renewed certain California subscriptions automatically without giving “clear and conspicuous” notice and without obtaining the affirmative consent California law requires before charging consumers for renewal periods. For qualifying California subscribers, the proposed $1.6 million settlement (with claims due by June 9, 2026) is meant to compensate people who were auto-renewed at least once between April 1, 2021 and May 31, 2025 and did not receive a full refund of those renewal charges; proof isn’t required at the initial claim stage because eligibility is based on a sworn attestation. MUBI denies wrongdoing but agreed to settle to avoid the expense and uncertainty of trial, making the agreement significant for consumers who may not have realized their subscription would continue billing. The broader implication is that subscription “auto-renewal” practices—common in streaming, software, and membership businesses—are tightly scrutinized in California and can trigger liability when disclosures are buried, unclear, or fail to secure proper consent. This case fits into a wider pattern of class actions targeting alleged violations of California’s consumer protection framework, including the state’s Automatic Renewal Law as enforced through the False Advertising Law and Unfair Competition Law; similar lawsuits have argued that companies must clearly explain renewal terms before charging and must get affirmative permission rather than relying on implied authorization. Industry-wide, these requirements push businesses to tighten checkout and renewal messaging, improve user controls over billing, and document consent flows; in this settlement, notice and administration costs will be deducted from the fund, and payments are available only to eligible claimants who submit by the deadline.

Entities Involved

MUBI, Inc.
Cesar Cejudo
Cejudo v. MUBI, Inc. (Case No. 5:25-CV-03652-BLF)
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Judge Beth Labson Freeman
Dovel & Luner LLP
Kroll Settlement Administration
Kroll Settlement Administration PO Box 225391 New York, NY 10150-5391
MubiSettlement.com
Netflix
A24-style films
False Advertising Law (California)
Unfair Competition Law (California)
Automatic Renewal Law (California)

Related Topics

MUBI class action settlement
MUBI auto renewal notice California
MUBI settlement 1.6 million
Cesar Cejudo v. MUBI
automatic renewal lawsuit California
MUBI subscription charged without notice
California subscription auto-renewal refund
False Advertising Law auto-renewal
Unfair Competition Law settlement
MubiSettlement.com claim
Kroll settlement administration MUBI
how to file a MUBI claim
MUBI class action claim deadline June 9 2026
California MUBI subscribers eligible

Eligibility Requirements

  • You were a resident of California
  • You signed up for a MUBI subscription on or after April 1, 2021
  • Your MUBI subscription was renewed at least once between April 1, 2021 and May 31, 2025
  • You did not receive a refund from MUBI of all renewal charges
  • You did not validly opt out (opt-outs are excluded from the class)

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest settlement updates and news.

Important Notice About Filing Claims

Submitting false information in a settlement claim is considered perjury and will result in your claim being rejected. Fraudulent claims harm legitimate class members and may result in legal consequences.

If you are unsure about your eligibility for this settlement, please visit the official settlement administrator’s website using the link provided above. Review the eligibility criteria carefully before submitting a claim.

Class Action Champion is an independent information resource and is not affiliated with any settlement administrator, law firm, or court. We provide settlement information as a service to help connect eligible class members with legitimate settlements.

Related Settlements

Delta Southwest United and Others Antitrust Ticket Settlement Varies Price Fixing

Delta Southwest United and Others Antitrust Ticket Settlement Varies Price Fixing

A class action settlement with payments that vary covers allegations that major U.S. airlines coordinated in ways that kept domestic airfare artificially high. It applies to people who bought eligible domestic flight tickets from Delta, Southwest, United, Continental, or US Airways between July 1, 2011 and December 2017, and from American Airlines between July 1, 2011 and June 14, 2018. Generally, eligible claimants are U.S. consumers who purchased qualifying domestic airline tickets during these periods.

Washington Nationals 18 Settlement Over 40 Fans Denied Millennial Ticket Discount

Washington Nationals 18 Settlement Over 40 Fans Denied Millennial Ticket Discount

This class action settlement provides payments of $18 or more to resolve claims that Washington Nationals ticket discount programs (“Millennial”/“Young Professional”) improperly excluded customers based on age. The issue concerns ticket purchases made during the 2023 and 2024 seasons. People who bought Nationals tickets in that period and were denied eligibility for the discount because they were age 40 or older may qualify to participate.

Ram Trucks ABS Class Action Settlement Up to 2500 for 2017 to 2018 models

Ram Trucks ABS Class Action Settlement Up to 2500 for 2017 to 2018 models

A class action settlement with a variable payout resolves claims involving the anti-lock braking system (ABS) on certain Ram heavy-duty trucks. It covers specific 2017–2018 Ram 2500, 3500, 4500, and 5500 vehicles manufactured from April 1, 2017 through December 29, 2018. Eligibility generally includes current owners or lessees of the covered models, with deadlines and benefit amounts depending on individual circumstances and claim type.

Branford Manor Up to 6000 Settlement Over Rental Form Listing Between 2019 and 2022

Branford Manor Up to 6000 Settlement Over Rental Form Listing Between 2019 and 2022

The Branford Manor class action settlement offers payments of up to $6,000 to eligible renters connected to Branford Manor. The case concerns alleged issues tied to Branford Manor rental paperwork affecting people listed on rental forms during the period from November 23, 2019 to November 22, 2022. Generally, anyone who was named on Branford Manor rental forms within that timeframe may qualify, with deadlines varying by claimant situation.