Toyota $299.5M Settlement Over Emissions Certification of 2007-2021 IC Forklifts

The Toyota $299.5M Settlement Over Emissions Certification of 2007-2021 IC Forklifts settlement offers $299.50M in total, with individual payouts of $1K to $2.50K to eligible claimants who purchased or leased a toyota internal-combustion (ic) forklift built between 2007 and 2021. The deadline to file is September 22, 2026. Proof of purchase is required.
Deadline: September 22, 2026
Total amount allocated for all claims
Estimated amount per eligible claim
Submit a completed claim form by September 22, 2026 and be prepared to provide supporting documentation such as proof of ownership or lease, purchase or lease date, model and serial number (VIN), evidence the forklift was originally sold/leased in the U.S., contact information, and records of prior owners/lessees if applicable. You may be contacted to supply missing items and will have 30 days to respond; proof of operability may be required to schedule the free service visit.
Settlement Summary
This class action alleges that Toyota Material Handling and related Toyota companies engaged in improper conduct around emissions certification for certain internal-combustion (IC) Toyota forklifts built 2007–2021—specifically units with 1KD, 1ZS, 1FS, or 4Y engines sold or leased in the United States. Rather than litigate to a final judgment, the parties agreed to a $299.5 million non-reversionary settlement fund that plaintiffs say will yield roughly $1,000–$2,500 per eligible forklift (plus one free on-site service visit per operable unit) after court-approved fees and claims are allocated; Toyota disputes the allegations and the court has not ruled on liability. The deal covers hundreds of thousands of machines, imposes claim and opt-out deadlines (claims due Sept. 22, 2026), and includes potential recall-related warranty protections — meaning many fleet owners and lessees can recover cash and maintenance value but will be bound by the settlement if they do nothing. Beyond the immediate payouts, the case highlights regulatory and commercial pressures on manufacturers of “nonroad” internal-combustion engines, which must meet emissions certification frameworks administered under the Clean Air Act by the EPA and state programs such as California’s CARB. It echoes other high-profile emissions disputes (for example, the Volkswagen diesel litigation) in showing how certification, compliance, and consumer reliance can spawn large class actions and settlement-driven remediation. For the material-handling industry, the settlement may prompt closer scrutiny of certification practices, encourage fleet operators to monitor recall and warranty rights, and influence how dealerships, service programs, and future regulatory enforcement are handled across manufacturers.
Entities Involved
Related Topics
Eligibility Requirements
- Purchased or leased a Toyota internal-combustion (IC) forklift built between 2007 and 2021
- Forklifts with covered engines: 1KD (2014–2021), 1ZS (2014–2021), 1FS (2013–2021), or 4Y (2007–2021)
- Forklift was originally sold or leased in the United States
- Purchase or lease occurred on or before January 20, 2026
- Applies to businesses, individuals, and other entities that owned or leased qualifying forklifts
- Excluded: Toyota officers, directors, employees, authorized dealers/distributors (and their employees) and anyone who opted out
Featured Investigations
Stay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest settlement updates and news.
Important Notice About Filing Claims
Submitting false information in a settlement claim is considered perjury and will result in your claim being rejected. Fraudulent claims harm legitimate class members and may result in legal consequences.
If you are unsure about your eligibility for this settlement, please visit the official settlement administrator’s website using the link provided above. Review the eligibility criteria carefully before submitting a claim.
Class Action Champion is an independent information resource and is not affiliated with any settlement administrator, law firm, or court. We provide settlement information as a service to help connect eligible class members with legitimate settlements.
Related Settlements
Absolute Dental Group $3.3 Million Settlement for 2025 Data Breach Losses
Absolute Dental Group LLC agreed to pay a $3.3 million class action settlement over a potential 2025 data breach affecting consumers’ personal information. The incident occurred between Feb. 19, 2025 and March 5, 2025, when unauthorized access may have exposed data. Eligible U.S. residents who received notice from Absolute Dental about the incident may claim up to $5,000 for documented losses and may also receive a pro rata cash payment, with certain California residents eligible for an enhanced amount.
Travelers PIP Settlement for New Jersey Claims Up to 70 or More for Deductible Reductions
A class action settlement totaling at least the net settlement fund (with attorneys’ fees up to $275,000 and service awards of $7,500) resolves allegations that Travelers and St. Paul improperly reduced New Jersey PIP coverage limits by counting deductibles and copayments, causing some insureds to receive less than the PIP benefits available. Eligible policyholders (and certain heirs/representatives) who received final PIP payments between April 14, 2017 and April 1, 2023 that were within $3,000 of their policy limit—but not the full limit—may receive an automatic $70 and possibly additional compensation.
MUBI $1.6 Million Settlement for California Auto-Renewal Without Notice
California subscribers of the MUBI streaming service may be eligible for a $1.6 million class action settlement over alleged auto-renewal charges without adequate notice or proper consent. The claims cover sign-ups beginning April 1, 2021 and auto-renewals occurring through May 31, 2025, as described in Cesar Cejudo v. MUBI, Inc. To be eligible, claimants must have been California residents whose subscription renewed at least once and who did not receive a full refund of renewal charges.
MetLife $1.2 Million Settlement for Underinsured Motorist Coverage Offsets in New Mexico
Metropolitan Direct Property and Casualty Insurance Co. (MetLife) agreed to pay $1.2 million to settle claims that it misrepresented or failed to disclose underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) coverage limits and used improper offsets. The issue relates to New Mexico auto insurance activity between Oct. 1, 2010, and Jan. 31, 2022. Eligible class members include qualifying policyholders who had UM/UIM claim offsets by at-fault payments or who purchased UM/UIM coverage in that period.
