Theranos $10+ Settlement Over Faulty Blood Testing Services Claims 2013 to 2016

The Theranos $10+ Settlement Over Faulty Blood Testing Services Claims 2013 to 2016 settlement, with individual payouts of TBD+ to eligible claimants who purchased or paid for theranos blood testing services. The filing deadline has not yet been announced. Proof of purchase is not required.
Deadline: No deadline specified
Total amount allocated for all claims
Estimated amount per eligible claim
No proof of purchase needed — anyone eligible can file a claim
No proof requirement is specified (listed as N/A). Claimants may still need to provide basic identifying and service/payment information if requested by the claims process.
Settlement Summary
Theranos was a Silicon Valley health-tech startup that promised it could run dozens of laboratory tests from just a finger-prick of blood, leading to rapid expansion through partnerships and patient testing from 2013 to 2016. Those claims later unraveled amid allegations that the company’s technology could not reliably perform as advertised and that many results were generated using conventional lab analyzers rather than the touted proprietary devices. As regulators and investigators scrutinized the company, its testing operations were curtailed and the episode became a widely cited example of the risks that can arise when medical innovation outpaces validation and transparency. The class action settlement addresses claims that consumers paid—out of pocket, through insurance, or otherwise—for blood testing services that were allegedly faulty or misrepresented during that period, and it provides a pathway for eligible individuals to receive a cash payment (reported as $10+ with deadlines varying). Lawsuits like this are significant because they focus on patient-facing harm and consumer protection: inaccurate lab results can trigger unnecessary follow-up care, missed diagnoses, stress, and financial costs. The case also sits within a heavily regulated diagnostics industry overseen through frameworks such as the federal Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA), which set quality standards for lab testing, and the FDA’s evolving approach to oversight of in vitro diagnostic products—areas that have also featured in other healthcare and device class actions alleging misleading performance claims, inadequate validation, or improper marketing of tests and screening tools.
Entities Involved
Related Topics
Eligibility Requirements
- Purchased or paid for Theranos blood testing services
- Payment was made between November 2013 and June 2016
- Payment was made out-of-pocket, through health insurance, or via another payment source
- Meets any applicable claim submission deadline (noted as varying)
Featured Investigations
Stay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest settlement updates and news.
Important Notice About Filing Claims
Submitting false information in a settlement claim is considered perjury and will result in your claim being rejected. Fraudulent claims harm legitimate class members and may result in legal consequences.
If you are unsure about your eligibility for this settlement, please visit the official settlement administrator’s website using the link provided above. Review the eligibility criteria carefully before submitting a claim.
Class Action Champion is an independent information resource and is not affiliated with any settlement administrator, law firm, or court. We provide settlement information as a service to help connect eligible class members with legitimate settlements.
Related Settlements
Anne Arundel Dermatology Data Breach Settlement $2.4 Million for Patient Info Security Claims
Anne Arundel Dermatology P.A. agreed to pay a $2.4 million settlement to resolve allegations that a data breach exposed patients’ personal and health information. The incident occurred between Feb. 14, 2025, and May 13, 2025. Eligible class members are people in the U.S. who provided or whose information the clinic collected, received, or possessed on or before Dec. 9, 2025.
Absolute Dental Group $3.3 Million Settlement for 2025 Data Breach Losses
Absolute Dental Group LLC agreed to pay a $3.3 million class action settlement over a potential 2025 data breach affecting consumers’ personal information. The incident occurred between Feb. 19, 2025 and March 5, 2025, when unauthorized access may have exposed data. Eligible U.S. residents who received notice from Absolute Dental about the incident may claim up to $5,000 for documented losses and may also receive a pro rata cash payment, with certain California residents eligible for an enhanced amount.
Travelers PIP Settlement for New Jersey Claims Up to 70 or More for Deductible Reductions
A class action settlement totaling at least the net settlement fund (with attorneys’ fees up to $275,000 and service awards of $7,500) resolves allegations that Travelers and St. Paul improperly reduced New Jersey PIP coverage limits by counting deductibles and copayments, causing some insureds to receive less than the PIP benefits available. Eligible policyholders (and certain heirs/representatives) who received final PIP payments between April 14, 2017 and April 1, 2023 that were within $3,000 of their policy limit—but not the full limit—may receive an automatic $70 and possibly additional compensation.
MUBI $1.6 Million Settlement for California Auto-Renewal Without Notice
California subscribers of the MUBI streaming service may be eligible for a $1.6 million class action settlement over alleged auto-renewal charges without adequate notice or proper consent. The claims cover sign-ups beginning April 1, 2021 and auto-renewals occurring through May 31, 2025, as described in Cesar Cejudo v. MUBI, Inc. To be eligible, claimants must have been California residents whose subscription renewed at least once and who did not receive a full refund of renewal charges.
