Skip to main content
Back
Apr 6, 2026

Splunk and Cisco Pay $1.22 Million Settlement for Washington Jobs Missing Pay Info

Settlement Image

The Splunk and Cisco Pay $1.22 Million Settlement for Washington Jobs Missing Pay Info settlement offers $1.22M in total, with individual payouts of $812.45K to $5B to eligible claimants who applied for a job with splunk llc or cisco systems inc.. The deadline to file is May 25, 2026. Proof of purchase is required.

Deadline
1 days remaining

Deadline: May 25, 2026

Total Settlement Amount
$1.22M

Total amount allocated for all claims

Individual Payout Range
$812.45K to $5B

Estimated amount per eligible claim

Proof of Purchase
Required

To submit an online claim, provide the notice ID and PIN from the settlement notice. If you cannot locate the ID/PIN, contact the settlement administrator and provide your full name and mailing address. Claims must be filed online or postmarked by May 25, 2026, and payments are mailed to the address provided on the claim form.

Settlement Summary

Splunk LLC and Cisco Systems Inc. agreed to a $1.22 million class action settlement for job applicants in Washington state whose postings—listed between Jan. 1, 2023, and July 26, 2025—allegedly did not include required pay information (such as a wage scale or salary range) and did not provide a general description of benefits or other compensation. The claim affects an estimated 488 people. The Washington law at the center of the dispute, the Washington Equal Pay and Opportunities Act, is designed to make pay transparency standard in hiring so candidates can compare compensation more fairly before accepting an offer, reducing guesswork and helping curb discriminatory pay practices. The lawsuit was filed to enforce those transparency requirements and to give affected applicants a concrete way to recover damages through a settlement process, even though the companies deny wrongdoing. If each eligible claimant submits a valid claim form, the expected payment is about $1,673.71, but the amount can vary depending on how many people file (and no one can receive more than $5,000). Broader implications are significant for tech and other employers that post roles across multiple locations—because this case reinforces that “remote-but-Washington-included” job ads and Washington-specific listings must comply with local disclosure rules. Similar pay-transparency class actions have appeared across the country, often targeting large employers’ online recruiting practices, and they reflect a wider regulatory push: states like Washington require job postings to disclose pay/benefits information, and failing to do so can trigger collective litigation and settlements, as happens in Milito v. Splunk LLC and Cisco Systems Inc.

Entities Involved

Splunk LLC
Cisco Systems Inc.
Milito v. Splunk LLC, et al.
Simpluris
EPOASettlementSLLC.com
Washington state
Legal Foundation of Washington
Washington Employment Lawyer’s Association

Related Topics

Splunk wage disclosure settlement
Cisco equal pay job posting settlement
Washington Equal Pay and Opportunities Act
job posting pay transparency class action
wage and benefits disclosure violation Washington
milito v. Splunk settlement
Equal Pay Act job posting lawsuit
Seattle job posting benefits not disclosed
class action for missing salary range
work from home Washington job postings settlement
employment law settlement Washington state
file claim by May 25 2026
EPOA settlement notice ID PIN
Simpluris claims administrator
estimated $1673.71 settlement payout

Eligibility Requirements

  • Applied for a job with Splunk LLC or Cisco Systems Inc.
  • Application date between Jan. 1, 2023 and July 26, 2025
  • Job posting was located in Washington state (including Seattle) or was a remote posting listing multiple cities/states that included Washington
  • The job posting did not disclose a wage scale or salary range and/or did not provide a general description of benefits or other compensation
  • Must be identified as a class member using company records (notice recipients are likely included)

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest settlement updates and news.

Important Notice About Filing Claims

Submitting false information in a settlement claim is considered perjury and will result in your claim being rejected. Fraudulent claims harm legitimate class members and may result in legal consequences.

If you are unsure about your eligibility for this settlement, please visit the official settlement administrator’s website using the link provided above. Review the eligibility criteria carefully before submitting a claim.

Class Action Champion is an independent information resource and is not affiliated with any settlement administrator, law firm, or court. We provide settlement information as a service to help connect eligible class members with legitimate settlements.

Related Settlements

Absolute Dental Group $3.3 Million Settlement for 2025 Data Breach Losses

Absolute Dental Group LLC agreed to pay a $3.3 million class action settlement over a potential 2025 data breach affecting consumers’ personal information. The incident occurred between Feb. 19, 2025 and March 5, 2025, when unauthorized access may have exposed data. Eligible U.S. residents who received notice from Absolute Dental about the incident may claim up to $5,000 for documented losses and may also receive a pro rata cash payment, with certain California residents eligible for an enhanced amount.

Travelers PIP Settlement for New Jersey Claims Up to 70 or More for Deductible Reductions

A class action settlement totaling at least the net settlement fund (with attorneys’ fees up to $275,000 and service awards of $7,500) resolves allegations that Travelers and St. Paul improperly reduced New Jersey PIP coverage limits by counting deductibles and copayments, causing some insureds to receive less than the PIP benefits available. Eligible policyholders (and certain heirs/representatives) who received final PIP payments between April 14, 2017 and April 1, 2023 that were within $3,000 of their policy limit—but not the full limit—may receive an automatic $70 and possibly additional compensation.

MUBI $1.6 Million Settlement for California Auto-Renewal Without Notice

California subscribers of the MUBI streaming service may be eligible for a $1.6 million class action settlement over alleged auto-renewal charges without adequate notice or proper consent. The claims cover sign-ups beginning April 1, 2021 and auto-renewals occurring through May 31, 2025, as described in Cesar Cejudo v. MUBI, Inc. To be eligible, claimants must have been California residents whose subscription renewed at least once and who did not receive a full refund of renewal charges.

MetLife $1.2 Million Settlement for Underinsured Motorist Coverage Offsets in New Mexico

Metropolitan Direct Property and Casualty Insurance Co. (MetLife) agreed to pay $1.2 million to settle claims that it misrepresented or failed to disclose underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) coverage limits and used improper offsets. The issue relates to New Mexico auto insurance activity between Oct. 1, 2010, and Jan. 31, 2022. Eligible class members include qualifying policyholders who had UM/UIM claim offsets by at-fault payments or who purchased UM/UIM coverage in that period.