Skip to main content
Back
May 2, 2026

SP Plus Corp Dayton Airport FACTA Settlement Up to $23 Voucher for Card Expiration Receipt Printing

Settlement Image

The SP Plus Corp Dayton Airport FACTA Settlement Up to $23 Voucher for Card Expiration Receipt Printing settlement, with individual payouts of $23 to eligible claimants who paid for parking at dayton international airport’s main parking garage or any surface lot (economy, short-term, or long-term) during oct. 14, 2014–oct. 14, 2016. The deadline to file is July 15, 2026. Proof of purchase is not required.

Deadline
1 days remaining

Deadline: July 15, 2026

Total Settlement Amount
TBD

Total amount allocated for all claims

Individual Payout Range
$23

Estimated amount per eligible claim

Proof of Purchase
Not Required

No proof of purchase needed — anyone eligible can file a claim

Claimants must provide contact information and the make and model of the vehicle they parked at Dayton International Airport during the class period. The notice does not list additional documentary proof (e.g., receipts) beyond the information required on the online claim form.

Settlement Summary

From October 14, 2014 to October 14, 2016, some drivers who paid for parking at Dayton International Airport with credit or debit cards received electronically printed paper receipts that included their card’s expiration date. A group of consumers filed a class action claiming that showing card expiration information on printed receipts violated the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA), a federal law designed to limit how certain payment data appears on receipts. The concern behind the complaint was that printed expiration details could make it easier for criminals to piece together payment information and potentially contribute to identity theft or fraud. The lawsuit—resolved through a settlement with SP Plus Corp.—was filed to enforce consumers’ rights under FACTA and to compensate people affected by the alleged receipt practice without requiring each person to sue separately. Eligible class members may submit a claim for a voucher worth up to $23 for use at Dayton International Airport parking, with rules such as one voucher per person, redemption only at specific exit stations for 90 days, and no cash value or stacking with other discounts. More broadly, cases like this reflect how the credit-card receipt rules changed nationwide after FACTA, and how companies can face litigation when receipt systems fail to mask or properly handle sensitive card information.

Entities Involved

SP Plus Corp.
SP Plus LLC
Dayton International Airport
Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA)
Settlement Administrator
United States District Court (implied by final approval hearing)
Dayton Airport Parking Settlement Website (daytonairportparkingsettlement.com)

Related Topics

Dayton International Airport parking settlement
SP Plus FACTA settlement
FACTA credit card expiration receipt
credit card expiration date on receipt class action
debit card expiration on receipt lawsuit
electronic paper receipt settlement voucher
Dayton airport parking voucher up to $23
Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act settlement
parking receipt class action claim
SP Plus LLC class action notice
identity theft risk receipt printing settlement
how to file a claim Dayton airport voucher
parking lot economy short-term long-term settlement
Daytonairportparkingsettlement.com claim form
voucher eligible claimants Dayton parking

Eligibility Requirements

  • Paid for parking at Dayton International Airport’s main parking garage or any surface lot (economy, short-term, or long-term) during Oct. 14, 2014–Oct. 14, 2016
  • Used a credit or debit card to pay for the parking
  • Received an electronically printed paper receipt at the time of payment
  • Submitted a valid claim during the claim period (deadline: July 15, 2026)
  • Can receive only one voucher total, even if multiple qualifying transactions occurred

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest settlement updates and news.

Important Notice About Filing Claims

Submitting false information in a settlement claim is considered perjury and will result in your claim being rejected. Fraudulent claims harm legitimate class members and may result in legal consequences.

If you are unsure about your eligibility for this settlement, please visit the official settlement administrator’s website using the link provided above. Review the eligibility criteria carefully before submitting a claim.

Class Action Champion is an independent information resource and is not affiliated with any settlement administrator, law firm, or court. We provide settlement information as a service to help connect eligible class members with legitimate settlements.

Related Settlements

Anne Arundel Dermatology Data Breach Settlement $2.4 Million for Patient Info Security Claims

Anne Arundel Dermatology P.A. agreed to pay a $2.4 million settlement to resolve allegations that a data breach exposed patients’ personal and health information. The incident occurred between Feb. 14, 2025, and May 13, 2025. Eligible class members are people in the U.S. who provided or whose information the clinic collected, received, or possessed on or before Dec. 9, 2025.

Absolute Dental Group $3.3 Million Settlement for 2025 Data Breach Losses

Absolute Dental Group LLC agreed to pay a $3.3 million class action settlement over a potential 2025 data breach affecting consumers’ personal information. The incident occurred between Feb. 19, 2025 and March 5, 2025, when unauthorized access may have exposed data. Eligible U.S. residents who received notice from Absolute Dental about the incident may claim up to $5,000 for documented losses and may also receive a pro rata cash payment, with certain California residents eligible for an enhanced amount.

Travelers PIP Settlement for New Jersey Claims Up to 70 or More for Deductible Reductions

A class action settlement totaling at least the net settlement fund (with attorneys’ fees up to $275,000 and service awards of $7,500) resolves allegations that Travelers and St. Paul improperly reduced New Jersey PIP coverage limits by counting deductibles and copayments, causing some insureds to receive less than the PIP benefits available. Eligible policyholders (and certain heirs/representatives) who received final PIP payments between April 14, 2017 and April 1, 2023 that were within $3,000 of their policy limit—but not the full limit—may receive an automatic $70 and possibly additional compensation.

MUBI $1.6 Million Settlement for California Auto-Renewal Without Notice

California subscribers of the MUBI streaming service may be eligible for a $1.6 million class action settlement over alleged auto-renewal charges without adequate notice or proper consent. The claims cover sign-ups beginning April 1, 2021 and auto-renewals occurring through May 31, 2025, as described in Cesar Cejudo v. MUBI, Inc. To be eligible, claimants must have been California residents whose subscription renewed at least once and who did not receive a full refund of renewal charges.