Skip to main content
Back
Apr 1, 2026

Service Spot Class Action Settlement for CA Parking Reservation Fees Up to $260

Settlement Image

The Service Spot Class Action Settlement for CA Parking Reservation Fees Up to $260 settlement to eligible claimants who you made a parking reservation/booking on parkon.com or cheapairportparking.org.. The deadline to file is December 17, 2026. Proof of purchase is not required.

Deadline
214 days remaining

Deadline: December 17, 2026

Total Settlement Amount
TBD

Total amount allocated for all claims

Individual Payout Range
TBD

Estimated amount per eligible claim

Proof of Purchase
Not Required

No proof of purchase needed — anyone eligible can file a claim

No proof is required for claim submission.

Settlement Summary

This class action settlement involves “mandatory” parking reservation fees charged in connection with booking parking through ParkOn.com or CheapAirportParking.org, where the fee was imposed as a condition of securing a parking spot—at least for California residents during a specific window (July 1, 2024 to June 9, 2025). The core allegation behind the case is that Service Spot (linked to these booking platforms) collected reservation charges from drivers in California in a way that plaintiffs claimed was improper, potentially leading consumers to pay more than they expected when making parking plans for airports, events, or other destinations. The lawsuit was filed to help aggregate many similar customer claims into a single process and, if approved, provide compensation to qualifying customers—notice of which is reflected in the settlement details (with potential payouts varying, up to $260, and a proof requirement listed as “No”). Its significance is that it offers a relatively low-friction way for consumers to recover money without each person pursuing a separate claim, while also pressuring parking and online booking intermediaries to more carefully disclose pricing and handle fee practices that affect thousands of transactions. Broader implications include a continued wave of consumer-protection litigation targeting “junk fees,” confusing pricing, and reservation or service charges in online commerce—especially where companies market low rates but then add mandatory add-ons at checkout. Industry-wise, parking reservation marketplaces and their partners must also navigate California consumer laws and related rules governing fair business practices, accurate advertising, and disclosures, and this settlement fits into similar enforcement and private-action efforts that have emerged across ticketing, lodging, and transportation booking platforms where fee transparency and consumer notice are key compliance themes.

Entities Involved

Service Spot
ParkOn.com
CheapAirportParking.org
servicespotsettlement.com

Related Topics

Service Spot settlement
parking reservation fee class action
ParkOn.com settlement
CheapAirportParking.org settlement
California parking reservation fees
mandatory parking booking fee
parking reservation refund claim
class action settlement California residents
parking booking lawsuit
travel parking reservation fees
Service Spot class action
ParkOn parking fees settlement
CheapAirportParking reservation fees
parking reservation class action settlement
online parking booking settlement

Eligibility Requirements

  • You made a parking reservation/booking on ParkOn.com or CheapAirportParking.org.
  • The booking date was between July 1, 2024 and June 9, 2025.
  • You paid a mandatory reservation fee.
  • You were a California resident at the time of booking/payment.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest settlement updates and news.

Important Notice About Filing Claims

Submitting false information in a settlement claim is considered perjury and will result in your claim being rejected. Fraudulent claims harm legitimate class members and may result in legal consequences.

If you are unsure about your eligibility for this settlement, please visit the official settlement administrator’s website using the link provided above. Review the eligibility criteria carefully before submitting a claim.

Class Action Champion is an independent information resource and is not affiliated with any settlement administrator, law firm, or court. We provide settlement information as a service to help connect eligible class members with legitimate settlements.

Related Settlements

Absolute Dental Group $3.3 Million Settlement for 2025 Data Breach Losses

Absolute Dental Group LLC agreed to pay a $3.3 million class action settlement over a potential 2025 data breach affecting consumers’ personal information. The incident occurred between Feb. 19, 2025 and March 5, 2025, when unauthorized access may have exposed data. Eligible U.S. residents who received notice from Absolute Dental about the incident may claim up to $5,000 for documented losses and may also receive a pro rata cash payment, with certain California residents eligible for an enhanced amount.

Travelers PIP Settlement for New Jersey Claims Up to 70 or More for Deductible Reductions

A class action settlement totaling at least the net settlement fund (with attorneys’ fees up to $275,000 and service awards of $7,500) resolves allegations that Travelers and St. Paul improperly reduced New Jersey PIP coverage limits by counting deductibles and copayments, causing some insureds to receive less than the PIP benefits available. Eligible policyholders (and certain heirs/representatives) who received final PIP payments between April 14, 2017 and April 1, 2023 that were within $3,000 of their policy limit—but not the full limit—may receive an automatic $70 and possibly additional compensation.

MUBI $1.6 Million Settlement for California Auto-Renewal Without Notice

California subscribers of the MUBI streaming service may be eligible for a $1.6 million class action settlement over alleged auto-renewal charges without adequate notice or proper consent. The claims cover sign-ups beginning April 1, 2021 and auto-renewals occurring through May 31, 2025, as described in Cesar Cejudo v. MUBI, Inc. To be eligible, claimants must have been California residents whose subscription renewed at least once and who did not receive a full refund of renewal charges.

MetLife $1.2 Million Settlement for Underinsured Motorist Coverage Offsets in New Mexico

Metropolitan Direct Property and Casualty Insurance Co. (MetLife) agreed to pay $1.2 million to settle claims that it misrepresented or failed to disclose underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) coverage limits and used improper offsets. The issue relates to New Mexico auto insurance activity between Oct. 1, 2010, and Jan. 31, 2022. Eligible class members include qualifying policyholders who had UM/UIM claim offsets by at-fault payments or who purchased UM/UIM coverage in that period.