Quaker Oats 12 Settlement Vouchers for Salmonella Risk Granola and Chewy Bar Recall

The Quaker Oats 12 Settlement Vouchers for Salmonella Risk Granola and Chewy Bar Recall settlement, with individual payouts of TBD to eligible claimants who purchased one or more quaker products included in the december 2023 national recall (specific items, lot numbers, and best-by dates as listed by the fda/recall site). The filing deadline has not yet been announced. Proof of purchase is not required.
Deadline: No deadline specified
Total amount allocated for all claims
Estimated amount per eligible claim
No proof of purchase needed — anyone eligible can file a claim
Proof of purchase is generally not required, especially for small-dollar claims (noted as under about $12). However, the administrator may later request documentation such as a receipt or photos of the product/packaging to validate a claim.
Settlement Summary
Quaker Oats (a PepsiCo brand) initiated a nationwide recall in December 2023 after the FDA publicized concerns that certain granola cereals and “Chewy” granola bar products could be contaminated with Salmonella, a bacterium that can cause serious gastrointestinal illness and poses heightened risks to children, seniors, and people with weakened immune systems. The recall covers specific products identified by “best by” dates and lot codes, while many other Quaker items (like traditional oats and several snack lines) are not included. In response, Quaker set up a consumer reimbursement process through an official recall website where eligible purchasers can submit claims for coupons/vouchers or potentially cash depending on the circumstances. Although the material reads more like a recall-reimbursement program than a traditional court-approved class action settlement, it functions similarly for consumers: it was created to compensate people who bought affected products and to reduce the fallout from a food-safety incident. The ability to file without proof of purchase for small claims (e.g., under about $12) is significant because receipts are often unavailable for low-cost groceries, and these “no-proof” options are common in consumer refund programs aimed at quickly resolving many small losses while discouraging fraud through sworn statements and possible follow-up requests. More broadly, this fits a familiar pattern seen in food contamination and mislabeling disputes, where recalls can be followed by consumer claims programs and, in some cases, class actions alleging economic harm (paying for a product that was unsafe or unusable), inadequate quality controls, or insufficient warning. The industry operates under FDA food-safety oversight and the broader framework of the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA), which emphasizes preventive controls, traceability, and prompt corrective action; when contamination risks arise, companies coordinate with regulators on public notices, lot-specific recall lists, and consumer remediation that can include refunds, vouchers, and dedicated support lines and claim portals.
Entities Involved
Related Topics
Eligibility Requirements
- Purchased one or more Quaker products included in the December 2023 national recall (specific items, lot numbers, and best-by dates as listed by the FDA/recall site)
- Purchase was made in the United States
- Submit a claim through QuakerGranolaRecall.com
- Provide truthful information and certify the claim (claims with fraudulent information may be denied)
- Do not submit claims for products explicitly excluded from the recall (e.g., Cap'n Crunch; Quaker Oats; Quaker Instant Oats; Quaker Oatmeal Squares; Quaker Grits; Quaker Oat Bran; Quaker Oat Flour; Quaker Rice Snacks)
Featured Investigations
Stay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest settlement updates and news.
Important Notice About Filing Claims
Submitting false information in a settlement claim is considered perjury and will result in your claim being rejected. Fraudulent claims harm legitimate class members and may result in legal consequences.
If you are unsure about your eligibility for this settlement, please visit the official settlement administrator’s website using the link provided above. Review the eligibility criteria carefully before submitting a claim.
Class Action Champion is an independent information resource and is not affiliated with any settlement administrator, law firm, or court. We provide settlement information as a service to help connect eligible class members with legitimate settlements.
Related Settlements
Absolute Dental Group $3.3 Million Settlement for 2025 Data Breach Losses
Absolute Dental Group LLC agreed to pay a $3.3 million class action settlement over a potential 2025 data breach affecting consumers’ personal information. The incident occurred between Feb. 19, 2025 and March 5, 2025, when unauthorized access may have exposed data. Eligible U.S. residents who received notice from Absolute Dental about the incident may claim up to $5,000 for documented losses and may also receive a pro rata cash payment, with certain California residents eligible for an enhanced amount.
Travelers PIP Settlement for New Jersey Claims Up to 70 or More for Deductible Reductions
A class action settlement totaling at least the net settlement fund (with attorneys’ fees up to $275,000 and service awards of $7,500) resolves allegations that Travelers and St. Paul improperly reduced New Jersey PIP coverage limits by counting deductibles and copayments, causing some insureds to receive less than the PIP benefits available. Eligible policyholders (and certain heirs/representatives) who received final PIP payments between April 14, 2017 and April 1, 2023 that were within $3,000 of their policy limit—but not the full limit—may receive an automatic $70 and possibly additional compensation.
MUBI $1.6 Million Settlement for California Auto-Renewal Without Notice
California subscribers of the MUBI streaming service may be eligible for a $1.6 million class action settlement over alleged auto-renewal charges without adequate notice or proper consent. The claims cover sign-ups beginning April 1, 2021 and auto-renewals occurring through May 31, 2025, as described in Cesar Cejudo v. MUBI, Inc. To be eligible, claimants must have been California residents whose subscription renewed at least once and who did not receive a full refund of renewal charges.
MetLife $1.2 Million Settlement for Underinsured Motorist Coverage Offsets in New Mexico
Metropolitan Direct Property and Casualty Insurance Co. (MetLife) agreed to pay $1.2 million to settle claims that it misrepresented or failed to disclose underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) coverage limits and used improper offsets. The issue relates to New Mexico auto insurance activity between Oct. 1, 2010, and Jan. 31, 2022. Eligible class members include qualifying policyholders who had UM/UIM claim offsets by at-fault payments or who purchased UM/UIM coverage in that period.
