Skip to main content
Back
Apr 1, 2026

PHH Mortgage Corp 1.5 million settlement for misleading default notices and FDCPA claims

Settlement Image

The PHH Mortgage Corp 1.5 million settlement for misleading default notices and FDCPA claims settlement offers $1.50M in total to eligible claimants who you were a borrower on a residential mortgage loan serviced by phh mortgage corp.. The deadline to file is May 5, 2026. Proof of purchase is not required.

Deadline
0 days remaining

Deadline: May 5, 2026

Total Settlement Amount
$1.50M

Total amount allocated for all claims

Individual Payout Range
TBD

Estimated amount per eligible claim

Proof of Purchase
Not Required

No proof of purchase needed — anyone eligible can file a claim

No specific proof of purchase is required and class members who do not exclude themselves will automatically receive benefits. If you choose to submit a claim or communication, follow the settlement administrator’s instructions and be prepared to provide loan/account identifiers, evidence you were serviced by PHH and that you received a default notice; any submission must be truthful and is made under penalty of perjury. Check the official settlement website/FAQ for exact documentation requirements.

Settlement Summary

PHH Mortgage Corp., a servicer for more than 1.5 million borrowers, agreed to a $1.5 million class settlement after plaintiffs alleged the company sent misleading notices of default that threatened immediate acceleration and foreclosure even though, the suit contends, PHH could not legally accelerate or foreclose until loans were at least 120 days delinquent. The settlement covers borrowers who received one or more notices during specified windows (national FDCPA class: Dec. 18, 2022–Dec. 15, 2025; California and North Carolina classes have slightly different date ranges), and provides cash payments based on the number of loans and each loan’s delinquency when PHH began servicing it; class members who do not opt out will automatically receive benefits, with an exclusion/objection deadline of May 5, 2026 and a final approval hearing set for June 9, 2026. PHH has denied wrongdoing but agreed to resolve the claims. This case is significant because it invokes the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and state debt-collection laws that bar deceptive or threatening communications, and it sits alongside other lawsuits and regulatory enforcement actions aimed at mortgage servicers’ default and foreclosure communications. Regulators such as the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and state attorneys general scrutinize servicers under statutes and rules like RESPA and state foreclosure law, so settlements like this can prompt changes in notice templates, training, and compliance controls across the industry to avoid claims of improper acceleration threats and protect borrowers from misleading debt-collection practices.

Entities Involved

PHH Mortgage Corp.
PHH
Williams, et al. v. PHH Mortgage Corporation
United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
PHH Settlement Administrator
Bryson Harris Suciu & DeMay PLLC
Scott C. Harris
Maginnis Howard
Edward H. Maginnis
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Zachary A. Madonia
C. Bailey King
Top Class Actions
Settlement Website (digitaldisbursements)

Related Topics

PHH mortgage settlement
PHH class action
mortgage default notice settlement
FDCPA settlement
debt collection lawsuit
mortgage servicer lawsuit
misleading foreclosure notice
mortgage borrower rights
class action mortgage settlement
foreclosure notice claim
PHH settlement claim
mortgage notice violation
settlement for borrowers
Williams v. PHH Mortgage

Eligibility Requirements

  • You were a borrower on a residential mortgage loan serviced by PHH Mortgage Corp.
  • The loan was secured by mortgaged property in the United States and you received one or more default notices from PHH between Dec. 18, 2022 and Dec. 15, 2025 (FDCPA/national class).
  • The loan was secured by property in California and you received one or more default notices from PHH between Dec. 18, 2022 and Dec. 15, 2025 (California class).
  • The loan was secured by property in North Carolina and you received one or more default notices from PHH between Jan. 14, 2021 and Dec. 15, 2025 (North Carolina class).
  • You did not timely exclude yourself from the class (deadline for exclusion/objection: May 5, 2026) to receive automatic settlement benefits.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest settlement updates and news.

Important Notice About Filing Claims

Submitting false information in a settlement claim is considered perjury and will result in your claim being rejected. Fraudulent claims harm legitimate class members and may result in legal consequences.

If you are unsure about your eligibility for this settlement, please visit the official settlement administrator’s website using the link provided above. Review the eligibility criteria carefully before submitting a claim.

Class Action Champion is an independent information resource and is not affiliated with any settlement administrator, law firm, or court. We provide settlement information as a service to help connect eligible class members with legitimate settlements.

Related Settlements

Anne Arundel Dermatology Data Breach Settlement $2.4 Million for Patient Info Security Claims

Anne Arundel Dermatology P.A. agreed to pay a $2.4 million settlement to resolve allegations that a data breach exposed patients’ personal and health information. The incident occurred between Feb. 14, 2025, and May 13, 2025. Eligible class members are people in the U.S. who provided or whose information the clinic collected, received, or possessed on or before Dec. 9, 2025.

Absolute Dental Group $3.3 Million Settlement for 2025 Data Breach Losses

Absolute Dental Group LLC agreed to pay a $3.3 million class action settlement over a potential 2025 data breach affecting consumers’ personal information. The incident occurred between Feb. 19, 2025 and March 5, 2025, when unauthorized access may have exposed data. Eligible U.S. residents who received notice from Absolute Dental about the incident may claim up to $5,000 for documented losses and may also receive a pro rata cash payment, with certain California residents eligible for an enhanced amount.

Travelers PIP Settlement for New Jersey Claims Up to 70 or More for Deductible Reductions

A class action settlement totaling at least the net settlement fund (with attorneys’ fees up to $275,000 and service awards of $7,500) resolves allegations that Travelers and St. Paul improperly reduced New Jersey PIP coverage limits by counting deductibles and copayments, causing some insureds to receive less than the PIP benefits available. Eligible policyholders (and certain heirs/representatives) who received final PIP payments between April 14, 2017 and April 1, 2023 that were within $3,000 of their policy limit—but not the full limit—may receive an automatic $70 and possibly additional compensation.

MUBI $1.6 Million Settlement for California Auto-Renewal Without Notice

California subscribers of the MUBI streaming service may be eligible for a $1.6 million class action settlement over alleged auto-renewal charges without adequate notice or proper consent. The claims cover sign-ups beginning April 1, 2021 and auto-renewals occurring through May 31, 2025, as described in Cesar Cejudo v. MUBI, Inc. To be eligible, claimants must have been California residents whose subscription renewed at least once and who did not receive a full refund of renewal charges.