Skip to main content
Back
Mar 25, 2026

Petersons Oil Service 12M Settlement Over Alleged Heating Fuel Delivery Practices

Settlement Image

The Petersons Oil Service 12M Settlement Over Alleged Heating Fuel Delivery Practices settlement, with individual payouts of TBD to eligible claimants who received heating fuel from peterson’s oil service, inc.. The deadline to file is February 11, 2026. Proof of purchase is not required.

Deadline
0 days remaining

Deadline: February 11, 2026

Total Settlement Amount
TBD

Total amount allocated for all claims

Individual Payout Range
TBD

Estimated amount per eligible claim

Proof of Purchase
Not Required

No proof of purchase needed — anyone eligible can file a claim

No proof is required to submit a claim, according to the settlement notice.

Settlement Summary

Peterson’s Oil Service, Inc.—which has operated under names including Peterson Oil, Cleghorn Oil, and Cape Discount Fuel—faces a proposed class action settlement of $12 million tied to how heating fuel deliveries were allegedly handled for residential and other customers. The case covers deliveries made between January 1, 2012 and November 12, 2025, and the settlement website indicates that eligible customers may receive a payment that varies based on the claims process, with a filing deadline of February 11, 2026 and no proof required. Disputes like this commonly arise in the home-heating market because consumers typically can’t directly verify the exact gallons delivered or the precise conditions under which fuel is measured, making trust in metering and invoicing practices central to the relationship between dealers and customers. The lawsuit was filed because plaintiffs allege the company’s delivery practices resulted in customers being overcharged or receiving less fuel than billed, and the settlement’s significance is that it offers compensation without each customer needing to bring an individual claim—something that would be impractical given the relatively small dollar amounts at stake per delivery. More broadly, similar class cases have targeted fuel dealers, propane providers, and other metered-commodity sellers over issues like meter accuracy, ticketing and recordkeeping, temperature/volume measurement, and fee disclosures; these cases often turn on whether a business complied with state “weights and measures” requirements and consumer protection laws governing fair billing and deceptive practices. Industrywide, heating fuel sellers operate under regulations and inspection regimes designed to ensure delivery meters are tested and sealed, invoices reflect accurate measurements, and advertising and pricing are not misleading—so settlements like this can push companies toward tighter compliance controls, more transparent delivery documentation, and increased scrutiny from regulators and competitors alike.

Entities Involved

Peterson’s Oil Service, Inc.
Peterson Oil
Cleghorn Oil
Cape Discount Fuel
Peterson’s Oil Service Class Action Settlement website (petersonoilclassactionsettlement.com)

Related Topics

Peterson’s Oil Service class action settlement
Peterson Oil settlement claim
Cleghorn Oil class action
Cape Discount Fuel settlement
heating fuel settlement
fuel delivery class action
oil delivery overcharge lawsuit
home heating oil settlement payout
file a claim Peterson’s Oil Service
Petersonoilclassactionsettlement.com
class action claim deadline February 2026
heating oil customer compensation
fuel customer settlement eligibility
oil service settlement payment

Eligibility Requirements

  • Received heating fuel from Peterson’s Oil Service, Inc.
  • Service may have been under the names Peterson Oil, Cleghorn Oil, or Cape Discount Fuel
  • Delivery occurred between January 1, 2012 and November 12, 2025
  • Submit a claim by the deadline (February 11, 2026)

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest settlement updates and news.

Important Notice About Filing Claims

Submitting false information in a settlement claim is considered perjury and will result in your claim being rejected. Fraudulent claims harm legitimate class members and may result in legal consequences.

If you are unsure about your eligibility for this settlement, please visit the official settlement administrator’s website using the link provided above. Review the eligibility criteria carefully before submitting a claim.

Class Action Champion is an independent information resource and is not affiliated with any settlement administrator, law firm, or court. We provide settlement information as a service to help connect eligible class members with legitimate settlements.

Related Settlements

Absolute Dental Group $3.3 Million Settlement for 2025 Data Breach Losses

Absolute Dental Group LLC agreed to pay a $3.3 million class action settlement over a potential 2025 data breach affecting consumers’ personal information. The incident occurred between Feb. 19, 2025 and March 5, 2025, when unauthorized access may have exposed data. Eligible U.S. residents who received notice from Absolute Dental about the incident may claim up to $5,000 for documented losses and may also receive a pro rata cash payment, with certain California residents eligible for an enhanced amount.

Travelers PIP Settlement for New Jersey Claims Up to 70 or More for Deductible Reductions

A class action settlement totaling at least the net settlement fund (with attorneys’ fees up to $275,000 and service awards of $7,500) resolves allegations that Travelers and St. Paul improperly reduced New Jersey PIP coverage limits by counting deductibles and copayments, causing some insureds to receive less than the PIP benefits available. Eligible policyholders (and certain heirs/representatives) who received final PIP payments between April 14, 2017 and April 1, 2023 that were within $3,000 of their policy limit—but not the full limit—may receive an automatic $70 and possibly additional compensation.

MUBI $1.6 Million Settlement for California Auto-Renewal Without Notice

California subscribers of the MUBI streaming service may be eligible for a $1.6 million class action settlement over alleged auto-renewal charges without adequate notice or proper consent. The claims cover sign-ups beginning April 1, 2021 and auto-renewals occurring through May 31, 2025, as described in Cesar Cejudo v. MUBI, Inc. To be eligible, claimants must have been California residents whose subscription renewed at least once and who did not receive a full refund of renewal charges.

MetLife $1.2 Million Settlement for Underinsured Motorist Coverage Offsets in New Mexico

Metropolitan Direct Property and Casualty Insurance Co. (MetLife) agreed to pay $1.2 million to settle claims that it misrepresented or failed to disclose underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) coverage limits and used improper offsets. The issue relates to New Mexico auto insurance activity between Oct. 1, 2010, and Jan. 31, 2022. Eligible class members include qualifying policyholders who had UM/UIM claim offsets by at-fault payments or who purchased UM/UIM coverage in that period.