Skip to main content
Back
Jul 3, 2026

Nationstar Mr. Cooper $1.5 Million Settlement for Improper Florida Mortgage Fees

Settlement Image

The Nationstar Mr. Cooper $1.5 Million Settlement for Improper Florida Mortgage Fees settlement offers $1.50M in total, with individual payouts of $300 to eligible claimants who the claimant had or has a mortgage contract serviced by nationstar mortgage llc (d/b/a mr. cooper) for a property located in florida.. The deadline to file is August 15, 2026. Proof of purchase is not required.

Deadline
3 days remaining

Deadline: August 15, 2026

Total Settlement Amount
$1.50M

Total amount allocated for all claims

Individual Payout Range
$300

Estimated amount per eligible claim

Proof of Purchase
Not Required

No proof of purchase needed — anyone eligible can file a claim

Provide the Claim ID and unique ID from the settlement notice received. No additional documents are explicitly required in the provided content, and the settlement administrator calculates payment based on which qualifying fees were charged and the number of claims submitted.

Settlement Summary

Homeowners in Florida who had mortgages serviced by Nationstar Mortgage LLC (doing business as Mr. Cooper) were accused of being charged certain “mortgage servicing” fees that didn’t match what was actually provided. According to the lawsuit, some borrowers were billed for service of process on unknown parties (often tied to court notices like “John/Jane Doe”), “property maintenance” fees that allegedly were really administrative costs for registering a property with a government entity, and “property inspection” fees even when no inspection took place. For borrowers, these charges matter because mortgage servicing fees can directly increase the cost of keeping a home—or worsen the financial pressure during delinquency or foreclosure processes. The case was filed as a class action to let many similarly affected borrowers pursue the same allegations together, rather than filing separate lawsuits. Nationstar agreed to settle for $1.5 million, with each qualifying class member potentially receiving a pro rata payment of up to $300, depending on how many eligible fees were paid and how many claims are submitted. The settlement is significant because it focuses on alleged violations of Florida consumer-protection and debt-collection-related laws, including the Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act, the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, and breach of contract—areas that regulate how servicers can assess fees and communicate with borrowers. While Nationstar denies the allegations, the settlement reflects a common legal strategy: resolving risk and cost without a trial. Broader implications include increased scrutiny of mortgage servicing practices—especially fee line items—across the industry, where servicers must comply with state requirements and also operate within a federal consumer protection framework such as the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), even though mortgage servicing companies’ obligations can vary depending on circumstances and who collects the debt. Similar cases have repeatedly challenged servicing charges like “inspection,” “maintenance,” “attorney,” and “process” fees when documentation or access to the property doesn’t support the billed activity. In this settlement, eligible claimants must have a Florida property with Nationstar servicing during the covered period and must have been charged one or more of the disputed fee types, with claims due by Aug. 15, 2026 and payments expected shortly after final court approval in September 2026.

Entities Involved

Nationstar Mortgage LLC
Mr. Cooper
U.S. Bank
Florida Nationstar Lawsuit
A.B. Data Ltd.
Court/Settlement administrator (general reference)
John Doe
Jane Doe
Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act
Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act

Related Topics

Nationstar mortgage class action
Mr. Cooper mortgage fees settlement
Florida mortgage servicing fees
service of process fee class action
John Doe spouse fee mortgage
property maintenance vs property registration fee
property inspection fee no inspection
Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act settlement
Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act
mortgage fee refund Florida
A.B. Data settlement administrator
claim up to $300 mortgage fees
Nationstar improper fees lawsuit
U.S. Bank Nationstar servicing

Eligibility Requirements

  • The claimant had or has a mortgage contract serviced by Nationstar Mortgage LLC (d/b/a Mr. Cooper) for a property located in Florida.
  • Nationstar serviced the mortgage on behalf of U.S. Bank or another note or mortgage holder between May 29, 2013 and the date of the final approval order.
  • Nationstar charged at least one qualifying fee, such as: a service-of-process fee on unknown parties (e.g., John Doe/Jane Doe spouse/tenant); a property maintenance fee that was actually a property registration fee; or a property inspection fee where no inspection occurred.
  • The claimant must submit a claim using the Claim ID and unique ID shown on the settlement notice they received.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest settlement updates and news.

Important Notice About Filing Claims

Submitting false information in a settlement claim is considered perjury and will result in your claim being rejected. Fraudulent claims harm legitimate class members and may result in legal consequences.

If you are unsure about your eligibility for this settlement, please visit the official settlement administrator’s website using the link provided above. Review the eligibility criteria carefully before submitting a claim.

Class Action Champion is an independent information resource and is not affiliated with any settlement administrator, law firm, or court. We provide settlement information as a service to help connect eligible class members with legitimate settlements.

Related Settlements

Anne Arundel Dermatology Data Breach Settlement $2.4 Million for Patient Info Security Claims

Anne Arundel Dermatology P.A. agreed to pay a $2.4 million settlement to resolve allegations that a data breach exposed patients’ personal and health information. The incident occurred between Feb. 14, 2025, and May 13, 2025. Eligible class members are people in the U.S. who provided or whose information the clinic collected, received, or possessed on or before Dec. 9, 2025.

Absolute Dental Group $3.3 Million Settlement for 2025 Data Breach Losses

Absolute Dental Group LLC agreed to pay a $3.3 million class action settlement over a potential 2025 data breach affecting consumers’ personal information. The incident occurred between Feb. 19, 2025 and March 5, 2025, when unauthorized access may have exposed data. Eligible U.S. residents who received notice from Absolute Dental about the incident may claim up to $5,000 for documented losses and may also receive a pro rata cash payment, with certain California residents eligible for an enhanced amount.

Travelers PIP Settlement for New Jersey Claims Up to 70 or More for Deductible Reductions

A class action settlement totaling at least the net settlement fund (with attorneys’ fees up to $275,000 and service awards of $7,500) resolves allegations that Travelers and St. Paul improperly reduced New Jersey PIP coverage limits by counting deductibles and copayments, causing some insureds to receive less than the PIP benefits available. Eligible policyholders (and certain heirs/representatives) who received final PIP payments between April 14, 2017 and April 1, 2023 that were within $3,000 of their policy limit—but not the full limit—may receive an automatic $70 and possibly additional compensation.

MUBI $1.6 Million Settlement for California Auto-Renewal Without Notice

California subscribers of the MUBI streaming service may be eligible for a $1.6 million class action settlement over alleged auto-renewal charges without adequate notice or proper consent. The claims cover sign-ups beginning April 1, 2021 and auto-renewals occurring through May 31, 2025, as described in Cesar Cejudo v. MUBI, Inc. To be eligible, claimants must have been California residents whose subscription renewed at least once and who did not receive a full refund of renewal charges.