Mitsubishi $8.5 Million Airbag Settlement for Defective Control Units and Non Deployment of Airbags
The Mitsubishi $8.5 Million Airbag Settlement for Defective Control Units and Non Deployment of Airbags settlement offers $8.50M in total, with individual payouts of $250 to eligible claimants who current or former owner or lessee of covered mitsubishi vehicles (2013–2017 lancer, 2013–2015 lancer evolution, 2013–2015 lancer ralliart, 2013–2016 lancer sportback, or 2013 outlander) as of nov. 1, 2024. The deadline to file is May 8, 2026. Proof of purchase is required.
Deadline: May 8, 2026
Total amount allocated for all claims
Estimated amount per eligible claim
Acceptable proof includes vehicle title, registration, purchase agreement, lease agreement, insurance documents, or other paperwork that shows both the driver/owner name and the vehicle VIN; documentation of a qualifying accident is required to request an inspection. All claims are submitted under penalty of perjury.
Settlement Summary
Mitsubishi agreed to an $8.5 million settlement resolving claims that certain 2013–2017 Lancer models and the 2013 Outlander were equipped with defective ZF‑TRW airbag control units (ACUs) that allegedly malfunctioned in collisions and caused airbag non‑deployment and other safety failures. The settlement covers current and former owners and lessees of the specified vehicles, offers up to $250 per vehicle for valid claims (with a possible second distribution up to $750 if funds remain), and funds a robust inspection program for qualifying accidents; Mitsubishi has not admitted wrongdoing. Key dates include the exclusion/objection deadline (Feb. 27, 2025), a final approval hearing (Apr. 7, 2025), and a claim deadline (May 8, 2026), and the case is filed as In re: ZF‑TRW Airbag Control Units Products Liability Litigation in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The lawsuit was filed as a products‑liability class action to hold the manufacturer and suppliers accountable for alleged safety defects that undermine the primary life‑saving role of airbags, and it highlights how class litigation and settlement programs can provide compensation and remedial inspections when many owners are affected. Broadly, the case fits into a pattern of high‑profile airbag and component litigation (for example, the Takata airbag inflator recalls and related lawsuits) that has driven greater regulatory scrutiny from NHTSA and reinforced automakers’ and suppliers’ obligations under Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards. For owners and lessees in the covered model years, the industry context and regulatory backdrop mean it’s important to check eligibility, meet documentation requirements, and file timely claims to participate in the settlement.
Entities Involved
Related Topics
Eligibility Requirements
- Current or former owner or lessee of covered Mitsubishi vehicles (2013–2017 Lancer, 2013–2015 Lancer Evolution, 2013–2015 Lancer Ralliart, 2013–2016 Lancer Sportback, or 2013 Outlander) as of Nov. 1, 2024
- Submit a valid claim form by May 8, 2026
- Provide required proof linking driver name to vehicle VIN (title, registration, purchase or lease agreement, insurance documentation, or similar)
- Class members may request a vehicle inspection if involved in a qualifying accident
- Do not opt out before the exclusion deadline (Feb. 27, 2025) if you wish to remain in the class and seek benefits
- Claims submitted under penalty of perjury; fraudulent claims are prohibited
Featured Investigations
Stay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest settlement updates and news.
Important Notice About Filing Claims
Submitting false information in a settlement claim is considered perjury and will result in your claim being rejected. Fraudulent claims harm legitimate class members and may result in legal consequences.
If you are unsure about your eligibility for this settlement, please visit the official settlement administrator’s website using the link provided above. Review the eligibility criteria carefully before submitting a claim.
Class Action Champion is an independent information resource and is not affiliated with any settlement administrator, law firm, or court. We provide settlement information as a service to help connect eligible class members with legitimate settlements.
Related Settlements
Absolute Dental Group $3.3 Million Settlement for 2025 Data Breach Losses
Absolute Dental Group LLC agreed to pay a $3.3 million class action settlement over a potential 2025 data breach affecting consumers’ personal information. The incident occurred between Feb. 19, 2025 and March 5, 2025, when unauthorized access may have exposed data. Eligible U.S. residents who received notice from Absolute Dental about the incident may claim up to $5,000 for documented losses and may also receive a pro rata cash payment, with certain California residents eligible for an enhanced amount.
Travelers PIP Settlement for New Jersey Claims Up to 70 or More for Deductible Reductions
A class action settlement totaling at least the net settlement fund (with attorneys’ fees up to $275,000 and service awards of $7,500) resolves allegations that Travelers and St. Paul improperly reduced New Jersey PIP coverage limits by counting deductibles and copayments, causing some insureds to receive less than the PIP benefits available. Eligible policyholders (and certain heirs/representatives) who received final PIP payments between April 14, 2017 and April 1, 2023 that were within $3,000 of their policy limit—but not the full limit—may receive an automatic $70 and possibly additional compensation.
MUBI $1.6 Million Settlement for California Auto-Renewal Without Notice
California subscribers of the MUBI streaming service may be eligible for a $1.6 million class action settlement over alleged auto-renewal charges without adequate notice or proper consent. The claims cover sign-ups beginning April 1, 2021 and auto-renewals occurring through May 31, 2025, as described in Cesar Cejudo v. MUBI, Inc. To be eligible, claimants must have been California residents whose subscription renewed at least once and who did not receive a full refund of renewal charges.
MetLife $1.2 Million Settlement for Underinsured Motorist Coverage Offsets in New Mexico
Metropolitan Direct Property and Casualty Insurance Co. (MetLife) agreed to pay $1.2 million to settle claims that it misrepresented or failed to disclose underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) coverage limits and used improper offsets. The issue relates to New Mexico auto insurance activity between Oct. 1, 2010, and Jan. 31, 2022. Eligible class members include qualifying policyholders who had UM/UIM claim offsets by at-fault payments or who purchased UM/UIM coverage in that period.