Skip to main content
Back
May 2, 2026

Keller Williams and RE/MAX $28.5 Million Buyer Commission Antitrust Settlement

Settlement Image

The Keller Williams and RE/MAX $28.5 Million Buyer Commission Antitrust Settlement settlement offers $28.50M in total to eligible claimants who purchased residential real estate in the united states. The deadline to file is August 25, 2026. Proof of purchase is not required.

Deadline
106 days remaining

Deadline: August 25, 2026

Total Settlement Amount
$28.50M

Total amount allocated for all claims

Individual Payout Range
TBD

Estimated amount per eligible claim

Proof of Purchase
Not Required

No proof of purchase needed — anyone eligible can file a claim

No proof is required upfront when filing the claim. After submitting, the administrator may request documentation to verify eligibility. To prepare, keep closing and listing records such as the HUD-1 settlement statement or Closing Disclosure, the purchase agreement, an MLS listing record showing the home was on an MLS, and closing-date documentation proving the purchase falls within the applicable state class period.

Settlement Summary

Real estate buyers across the U.S. have long been affected by how commissions are set and communicated through the industry’s “MLS” system (multiple listing services). In the Batton v. NAR case, the plaintiffs allege that major broker companies—including Keller Williams and RE/MAX—worked together with the National Association of REALTORS (NAR) and other industry players to artificially fix and inflate buyer-agent commissions, which they say pushed up the overall cost of buying a home. The lawsuit claims this conduct distorted competition in residential brokerage services, effectively channeling higher transaction costs to buyers when homes were listed through MLS databases and offered with standardized commission terms. Keller Williams and RE/MAX have agreed to a combined $28.5 million settlement—$20 million from Keller Williams and $8.5 million from RE/MAX—to resolve the buyer-side antitrust allegations, though both firms deny wrongdoing. The significance for consumers is that this is a buyer class action aimed at dollars for people who purchased MLS-listed homes during each state’s class period (starting in years that vary by state and ending April 14, 2026), with a claim deadline of August 25, 2026 and no requirement to submit proof upfront (supporting documents may be requested later). Broader implications are important because the settlement is continuing alongside other defendants—NAR and Anywhere Real Estate (formerly Realogy Holdings)—and it fits into a wider regulatory and legal backdrop: U.S. antitrust laws (including the Sherman Act) restrict conspiracies that restrain trade or fix prices, and recent scrutiny of real-estate commission practices reflects a growing push for competitive, transparent listing and compensation rules within the MLS-driven brokerage ecosystem

Entities Involved

Keller Williams Realty LLC
RE/MAX LLC
National Association of REALTORS (NAR)
Anywhere Real Estate (formerly Realogy Holdings)
Batton, et al. v. The National Association of REALTORS, et al. (No. 1:21-cv-00430)
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Judge LaShonda A. Hunt
Lowey Dannenberg P.C.
Korein Tillery LLC
A.B. Data Ltd
HomeBuyerLitigation.com
Burnett v. NAR
Home buyers / class members (claimants)
HUD-1
Closing Disclosure
MLS (Multiple Listing Service)
HUD-1 settlement statement / settlement statement

Related Topics

home buyer class action settlement
MLS listed home settlement
RE/MAX settlement claim
Keller Williams settlement claim
broker commission antitrust settlement
real estate antitrust lawsuit
NAR broker commissions settlement
Batton v. NAR settlement
HomeBuyerLitigation.com
A.B. Data Ltd settlement administrator
buy-side real estate commission class action
housing price inflation lawsuit
how to file a claim for home buyer settlement
deadline August 25 2026 home buyer claim
verify class action settlement legitimacy

Eligibility Requirements

  • Purchased residential real estate in the United States
  • The home was listed on a multiple listing service (MLS)
  • The purchase occurred within the applicable state class period that begins on the listed state start date and ends on April 14, 2026
  • For the RE/MAX portion only: excluded if the person was a settlement class member in the RE/MAX seller-side settlement in Burnett v. NAR
  • For Keller Williams portion only: Burnett seller-side class membership does not disqualify participation

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest settlement updates and news.

Important Notice About Filing Claims

Submitting false information in a settlement claim is considered perjury and will result in your claim being rejected. Fraudulent claims harm legitimate class members and may result in legal consequences.

If you are unsure about your eligibility for this settlement, please visit the official settlement administrator’s website using the link provided above. Review the eligibility criteria carefully before submitting a claim.

Class Action Champion is an independent information resource and is not affiliated with any settlement administrator, law firm, or court. We provide settlement information as a service to help connect eligible class members with legitimate settlements.

Related Settlements

Absolute Dental Group $3.3 Million Settlement for 2025 Data Breach Losses

Absolute Dental Group LLC agreed to pay a $3.3 million class action settlement over a potential 2025 data breach affecting consumers’ personal information. The incident occurred between Feb. 19, 2025 and March 5, 2025, when unauthorized access may have exposed data. Eligible U.S. residents who received notice from Absolute Dental about the incident may claim up to $5,000 for documented losses and may also receive a pro rata cash payment, with certain California residents eligible for an enhanced amount.

Travelers PIP Settlement for New Jersey Claims Up to 70 or More for Deductible Reductions

A class action settlement totaling at least the net settlement fund (with attorneys’ fees up to $275,000 and service awards of $7,500) resolves allegations that Travelers and St. Paul improperly reduced New Jersey PIP coverage limits by counting deductibles and copayments, causing some insureds to receive less than the PIP benefits available. Eligible policyholders (and certain heirs/representatives) who received final PIP payments between April 14, 2017 and April 1, 2023 that were within $3,000 of their policy limit—but not the full limit—may receive an automatic $70 and possibly additional compensation.

MUBI $1.6 Million Settlement for California Auto-Renewal Without Notice

California subscribers of the MUBI streaming service may be eligible for a $1.6 million class action settlement over alleged auto-renewal charges without adequate notice or proper consent. The claims cover sign-ups beginning April 1, 2021 and auto-renewals occurring through May 31, 2025, as described in Cesar Cejudo v. MUBI, Inc. To be eligible, claimants must have been California residents whose subscription renewed at least once and who did not receive a full refund of renewal charges.

MetLife $1.2 Million Settlement for Underinsured Motorist Coverage Offsets in New Mexico

Metropolitan Direct Property and Casualty Insurance Co. (MetLife) agreed to pay $1.2 million to settle claims that it misrepresented or failed to disclose underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) coverage limits and used improper offsets. The issue relates to New Mexico auto insurance activity between Oct. 1, 2010, and Jan. 31, 2022. Eligible class members include qualifying policyholders who had UM/UIM claim offsets by at-fault payments or who purchased UM/UIM coverage in that period.