Kaiser Permanente 200 Million Settlement Over Out of Network Mental Health Claims

The Kaiser Permanente 200 Million Settlement Over Out of Network Mental Health Claims settlement to eligible claimants who were a kaiser permanente member (california). The filing deadline has not yet been announced. Proof of purchase is required.
Deadline: No deadline specified
Total amount allocated for all claims
Estimated amount per eligible claim
Claimants should be prepared to provide documentation showing (1) Kaiser membership, (2) dates and type of out-of-network mental health/substance use disorder services received after Jan. 1, 2021, (3) amounts paid out-of-pocket, and (4) evidence they attempted to obtain in-network care but could not (such as appointment records, referral/authorization communications, call logs, or written notices).
Settlement Summary
Kaiser Permanente, one of the nation’s largest integrated health systems, generally steers members to its own in-network clinicians, but many patients report long waits or limited availability for mental health and substance use disorder treatment. When timely in-network care isn’t accessible, patients may seek out-of-network providers and pay far more out of pocket—an issue that has drawn increased scrutiny as demand for behavioral health services has surged. This California class action settlement focuses on Kaiser members who say they paid for out-of-network mental health or substance use care after first attempting, but being unable, to obtain appropriate in-network treatment on or after January 1, 2021, with the settlement requiring proof and offering payments that vary based on individual circumstances. The lawsuit was filed because plaintiffs allege Kaiser improperly handled or denied reimbursement for out-of-network behavioral health claims in situations where members contend they had no realistic in-network option, raising questions about whether insurer practices effectively shifted costs to patients during a mental health access crunch. Its significance lies in the size of the settlement (reported as $200 million) and the signal it sends to large health plans that network adequacy and claims processing for behavioral health are not just customer-service concerns but potential legal liabilities. The case also fits into a broader pattern of litigation and enforcement around “mental health parity” and access standards—areas governed by laws such as the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (requiring behavioral health coverage to be no more restrictive than medical/surgical coverage) and, in California, the Knox-Keene Act and related timely-access rules—alongside similar disputes nationwide where patients challenge insurers for inadequate networks, delayed care, or reimbursement barriers that make covered mental health treatment difficult to obtain in practice
Entities Involved
Related Topics
Eligibility Requirements
- Were a Kaiser Permanente member (California)
- Sought mental health and/or substance use disorder treatment
- Tried to access in-network care but could not (e.g., access barriers or unavailability)
- Paid out-of-network costs for the care
- The out-of-network payments occurred after January 1, 2021
Featured Investigations
Stay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest settlement updates and news.
Important Notice About Filing Claims
Submitting false information in a settlement claim is considered perjury and will result in your claim being rejected. Fraudulent claims harm legitimate class members and may result in legal consequences.
If you are unsure about your eligibility for this settlement, please visit the official settlement administrator’s website using the link provided above. Review the eligibility criteria carefully before submitting a claim.
Class Action Champion is an independent information resource and is not affiliated with any settlement administrator, law firm, or court. We provide settlement information as a service to help connect eligible class members with legitimate settlements.
Related Settlements
Anne Arundel Dermatology Data Breach Settlement $2.4 Million for Patient Info Security Claims
Anne Arundel Dermatology P.A. agreed to pay a $2.4 million settlement to resolve allegations that a data breach exposed patients’ personal and health information. The incident occurred between Feb. 14, 2025, and May 13, 2025. Eligible class members are people in the U.S. who provided or whose information the clinic collected, received, or possessed on or before Dec. 9, 2025.
Absolute Dental Group $3.3 Million Settlement for 2025 Data Breach Losses
Absolute Dental Group LLC agreed to pay a $3.3 million class action settlement over a potential 2025 data breach affecting consumers’ personal information. The incident occurred between Feb. 19, 2025 and March 5, 2025, when unauthorized access may have exposed data. Eligible U.S. residents who received notice from Absolute Dental about the incident may claim up to $5,000 for documented losses and may also receive a pro rata cash payment, with certain California residents eligible for an enhanced amount.
Travelers PIP Settlement for New Jersey Claims Up to 70 or More for Deductible Reductions
A class action settlement totaling at least the net settlement fund (with attorneys’ fees up to $275,000 and service awards of $7,500) resolves allegations that Travelers and St. Paul improperly reduced New Jersey PIP coverage limits by counting deductibles and copayments, causing some insureds to receive less than the PIP benefits available. Eligible policyholders (and certain heirs/representatives) who received final PIP payments between April 14, 2017 and April 1, 2023 that were within $3,000 of their policy limit—but not the full limit—may receive an automatic $70 and possibly additional compensation.
MUBI $1.6 Million Settlement for California Auto-Renewal Without Notice
California subscribers of the MUBI streaming service may be eligible for a $1.6 million class action settlement over alleged auto-renewal charges without adequate notice or proper consent. The claims cover sign-ups beginning April 1, 2021 and auto-renewals occurring through May 31, 2025, as described in Cesar Cejudo v. MUBI, Inc. To be eligible, claimants must have been California residents whose subscription renewed at least once and who did not receive a full refund of renewal charges.
