Skip to main content
Back
Mar 25, 2026

Grubhub 5 million settlement for misleading delivery fees hidden charges and inflated menu prices

Settlement Image

The Grubhub 5 million settlement for misleading delivery fees hidden charges and inflated menu prices settlement offers $5M in total to eligible claimants who placed and paid for a delivery order through the grubhub or seamless app or website between january 24, 2019 and january 12, 2026. The deadline to file is May 12, 2026. Proof of purchase is required.

Deadline
0 days remaining

Deadline: May 12, 2026

Total Settlement Amount
$5M

Total amount allocated for all claims

Individual Payout Range
TBD

Estimated amount per eligible claim

Proof of Purchase
Required

A Unique ID from the mailed or emailed settlement notice is required when filing the online claim; enter that code on the claim form. If you did not receive or misplaced the notice, contact the settlement administrator to obtain your ID. Submit the online claim by May 12, 2026; the administrator will verify eligibility and may request supporting order details or receipts if needed.

Settlement Summary

The class action Wang et al. v. Grubhub alleges that Grubhub and Seamless misled California customers between January 24, 2019 and January 12, 2026 by hiding or inflating costs—charging “delivery” and service fees that weren’t clearly disclosed, advertising “free delivery” for Grubhub+ members while other fees applied, and listing menu prices higher than restaurants’ own prices. Grubhub denies wrongdoing and the court has not ruled, but the parties agreed to a settlement that offers a $10 Grubhub site credit per valid claim (claim deadline May 12, 2026) with a $5 million cap on total credits; claimants must file to receive the credit, which is California-only, and Grubhub separately pays up to $1 million in attorneys’ fees plus incentive awards for the named plaintiffs. Beyond the payout, the settlement requires clearer pricing displays (separate line items for fees and taxes) and stops advertising “free delivery” where other fees still apply, shifting to “$0 delivery” with a note that other fees may apply. That change—alongside similar suits against other delivery platforms over markups, tipping, and hidden fees—reflects broader consumer-protection enforcement under California’s Unfair Competition, False Advertising, and consumer-rights statutes and could prompt industry-wide shifts toward greater fee transparency and regulatory scrutiny.

Entities Involved

Grubhub Inc.
Seamless
Grubhub+
Wang et al. v. Grubhub
Case No. 23STCV24118
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles
Judge Timothy Patrick Dillon
KalielGold PLLC
Class representatives: Charles Wang, Marilee Bogaert, Robert Allan Perkins Jr., Carissa Recco, Christine Bak, Denise Sznitko, Jesse Stout
Settlement Administrator
GHdeliveryfeesettlement.com
Settlement Administrator P.O. Box 2349, Portland, OR 97208-2349

Related Topics

Grubhub settlement
Grubhub class action
Seamless settlement
delivery fee lawsuit
Grubhub $10 credit
file Grubhub claim
GHdeliveryfeesettlement
California Grubhub settlement
food delivery lawsuit
fee transparency Grubhub
Wang v. Grubhub
Grubhub Seamless claim
claim deadline May 12 2026
Grubhub+ free delivery issue
menu price markup lawsuit

Eligibility Requirements

  • Placed and paid for a delivery order through the Grubhub or Seamless app or website between January 24, 2019 and January 12, 2026
  • Order was delivered to an address in California (pickup orders are excluded)
  • You lived in California at any point during the class period and used Grubhub/Seamless for delivery
  • You must submit a timely, valid claim form online by the Claim Form Deadline (May 12, 2026)
  • Filing a claim releases your right to separately sue Grubhub over the same allegations

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest settlement updates and news.

Important Notice About Filing Claims

Submitting false information in a settlement claim is considered perjury and will result in your claim being rejected. Fraudulent claims harm legitimate class members and may result in legal consequences.

If you are unsure about your eligibility for this settlement, please visit the official settlement administrator’s website using the link provided above. Review the eligibility criteria carefully before submitting a claim.

Class Action Champion is an independent information resource and is not affiliated with any settlement administrator, law firm, or court. We provide settlement information as a service to help connect eligible class members with legitimate settlements.

Related Settlements

Anne Arundel Dermatology Data Breach Settlement $2.4 Million for Patient Info Security Claims

Anne Arundel Dermatology P.A. agreed to pay a $2.4 million settlement to resolve allegations that a data breach exposed patients’ personal and health information. The incident occurred between Feb. 14, 2025, and May 13, 2025. Eligible class members are people in the U.S. who provided or whose information the clinic collected, received, or possessed on or before Dec. 9, 2025.

Absolute Dental Group $3.3 Million Settlement for 2025 Data Breach Losses

Absolute Dental Group LLC agreed to pay a $3.3 million class action settlement over a potential 2025 data breach affecting consumers’ personal information. The incident occurred between Feb. 19, 2025 and March 5, 2025, when unauthorized access may have exposed data. Eligible U.S. residents who received notice from Absolute Dental about the incident may claim up to $5,000 for documented losses and may also receive a pro rata cash payment, with certain California residents eligible for an enhanced amount.

Travelers PIP Settlement for New Jersey Claims Up to 70 or More for Deductible Reductions

A class action settlement totaling at least the net settlement fund (with attorneys’ fees up to $275,000 and service awards of $7,500) resolves allegations that Travelers and St. Paul improperly reduced New Jersey PIP coverage limits by counting deductibles and copayments, causing some insureds to receive less than the PIP benefits available. Eligible policyholders (and certain heirs/representatives) who received final PIP payments between April 14, 2017 and April 1, 2023 that were within $3,000 of their policy limit—but not the full limit—may receive an automatic $70 and possibly additional compensation.

MUBI $1.6 Million Settlement for California Auto-Renewal Without Notice

California subscribers of the MUBI streaming service may be eligible for a $1.6 million class action settlement over alleged auto-renewal charges without adequate notice or proper consent. The claims cover sign-ups beginning April 1, 2021 and auto-renewals occurring through May 31, 2025, as described in Cesar Cejudo v. MUBI, Inc. To be eligible, claimants must have been California residents whose subscription renewed at least once and who did not receive a full refund of renewal charges.