Skip to main content
Back
Apr 1, 2026

Driven Brands 25 Million Class Action Settlement over Alleged Securities Misstatements

Settlement Image

The Driven Brands 25 Million Class Action Settlement over Alleged Securities Misstatements settlement offers $25M in total, with individual payouts of $1 to eligible claimants who purchased driven brands holdings inc. (drvn, cusip 26210v102) common stock between oct. 27, 2021 and aug. 1, 2023, inclusive. The deadline to file is July 6, 2026. Proof of purchase is required.

Deadline
53 days remaining

Deadline: July 6, 2026

Total Settlement Amount
$25M

Total amount allocated for all claims

Individual Payout Range
$1

Estimated amount per eligible claim

Proof of Purchase
Required

Claimants must provide the last four digits of their Social Security number or taxpayer identification number, holdings as of the close of trading on Oct. 26, 2021, all purchases and sales of Driven common stock from Oct. 27, 2021 through Oct. 30, 2023, and shares held as of the close of trading on Oct. 30, 2023. Supporting documentation is required, such as broker confirmation slips, broker account statements, or an authorized broker statement showing transactional and holding details. Representatives filing for others must supply proof of authority.

Settlement Summary

Driven Brands, a multi-brand auto‑services company with car‑wash and auto‑glass ambitions, agreed to a $25 million settlement resolving a securities class action on behalf of investors who bought its common stock between Oct. 27, 2021 and Aug. 1, 2023. Plaintiffs alleged Driven Brands and two former executives made false or misleading statements about the company’s effort to create a nationwide auto‑glass business and about operational execution and customer retention in its car wash business, inflating the stock price; the defendants denied wrongdoing but settled to avoid protracted litigation. The settlement fund will be shared pro rata after court‑approved deductions for administrative costs and attorneys’ fees, meaning individual recoveries will depend on purchase and sale timing, recognized losses and the number of valid claims. This suit fits a well‑worn pattern in securities litigation: investors invoke federal securities laws—most commonly Section 10(b) and SEC Rule 10b‑5—and the “fraud‑on‑the‑market” theory to seek recovery when alleged misstatements coincide with share price inflation and a market drop. Such cases are significant beyond individual recoveries because they pressure public companies, especially those pursuing rapid growth or roll‑ups, to maintain rigorous disclosure and internal controls; regulatory scrutiny by the SEC and parallel derivative or enforcement actions sometimes follow. Similar claims have arisen across industries where execution and growth promises drive valuations, and settlements like this both compensate investors and underscore the disclosure and governance risks firms face in the auto‑services and broader corporate sectors.

Entities Involved

Driven Brands Holdings Inc.
Jonathan G. Fitzpatrick
Tiffany L. Mason
DRVN
CUSIP 26210V102
Strategic Claims Services
Driven Brands Securities Litigation (settlement administrator)

Related Topics

Driven Brands settlement
DRVN class action
Driven Brands securities lawsuit
stockholder settlement DRVN
file DRVN claim
securities class action settlement
investor settlement Driven Brands
auto glass misrepresentation
car wash customer retention lawsuit
stock claim deadline July 6 2026
how to file claim Driven Brands
DRVN shareholder payout
brokerage proof of purchase
claim form Driven Brands

Eligibility Requirements

  • Purchased Driven Brands Holdings Inc. (DRVN, CUSIP 26210V102) common stock between Oct. 27, 2021 and Aug. 1, 2023, inclusive
  • Both individual investors and institutional entities are eligible
  • Each separate legal entity or separately managed account must file its own claim
  • Joint beneficial owners must each sign the claim form
  • Agents, executors, administrators, guardians or trustees may file on behalf of a claimant but must provide proof of authority
  • Claimant must submit a timely claim by the deadline (July 6, 2026) to receive payment

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest settlement updates and news.

Important Notice About Filing Claims

Submitting false information in a settlement claim is considered perjury and will result in your claim being rejected. Fraudulent claims harm legitimate class members and may result in legal consequences.

If you are unsure about your eligibility for this settlement, please visit the official settlement administrator’s website using the link provided above. Review the eligibility criteria carefully before submitting a claim.

Class Action Champion is an independent information resource and is not affiliated with any settlement administrator, law firm, or court. We provide settlement information as a service to help connect eligible class members with legitimate settlements.

Related Settlements

Anne Arundel Dermatology Data Breach Settlement $2.4 Million for Patient Info Security Claims

Anne Arundel Dermatology P.A. agreed to pay a $2.4 million settlement to resolve allegations that a data breach exposed patients’ personal and health information. The incident occurred between Feb. 14, 2025, and May 13, 2025. Eligible class members are people in the U.S. who provided or whose information the clinic collected, received, or possessed on or before Dec. 9, 2025.

Travelers PIP Settlement for New Jersey Claims Up to 70 or More for Deductible Reductions

A class action settlement totaling at least the net settlement fund (with attorneys’ fees up to $275,000 and service awards of $7,500) resolves allegations that Travelers and St. Paul improperly reduced New Jersey PIP coverage limits by counting deductibles and copayments, causing some insureds to receive less than the PIP benefits available. Eligible policyholders (and certain heirs/representatives) who received final PIP payments between April 14, 2017 and April 1, 2023 that were within $3,000 of their policy limit—but not the full limit—may receive an automatic $70 and possibly additional compensation.

MUBI $1.6 Million Settlement for California Auto-Renewal Without Notice

California subscribers of the MUBI streaming service may be eligible for a $1.6 million class action settlement over alleged auto-renewal charges without adequate notice or proper consent. The claims cover sign-ups beginning April 1, 2021 and auto-renewals occurring through May 31, 2025, as described in Cesar Cejudo v. MUBI, Inc. To be eligible, claimants must have been California residents whose subscription renewed at least once and who did not receive a full refund of renewal charges.

MetLife $1.2 Million Settlement for Underinsured Motorist Coverage Offsets in New Mexico

Metropolitan Direct Property and Casualty Insurance Co. (MetLife) agreed to pay $1.2 million to settle claims that it misrepresented or failed to disclose underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) coverage limits and used improper offsets. The issue relates to New Mexico auto insurance activity between Oct. 1, 2010, and Jan. 31, 2022. Eligible class members include qualifying policyholders who had UM/UIM claim offsets by at-fault payments or who purchased UM/UIM coverage in that period.