Disney $2.75M CCPA Settlement Over Failed Opt Out of Data Sale Across Apps

The Disney $2.75M CCPA Settlement Over Failed Opt Out of Data Sale Across Apps settlement offers $2.75M in total to eligible claimants who be a california resident. The filing deadline has not yet been announced. Proof of purchase is not required.
Deadline: No deadline specified
Total amount allocated for all claims
Estimated amount per eligible claim
No proof of purchase needed — anyone eligible can file a claim
No proof or claim submission is required because the settlement provides injunctive relief (changes to opt-out tools, notices, confirmations, and compliance monitoring) rather than payments to individual consumers.
Settlement Summary
California’s Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) gives residents the right to tell businesses not to “sell” or “share” their personal information—terms that can include certain ad-tech disclosures, cross-app tracking, and data passed to third parties via embedded code. The dispute here centers on how modern streaming ecosystems work in practice: users often access Disney+, Hulu, and ESPN+ across multiple devices under one account, while behind the scenes various identifiers and tracking tools help personalize ads and measure engagement. Regulators argue that if an opt-out is supposed to stop data selling/sharing, it should be easy to find, easy to use, and effective across the consumer’s relationship with the company, not limited to a single app screen or device. California Attorney General Rob Bonta pursued the case alleging Disney’s opt-out mechanisms were confusing and incomplete—sometimes applying only to the specific service (e.g., Disney+ but not Hulu), only to the device used to submit the request, or only to Disney’s own ad systems while still allowing third-party data flows through tracking code. That alleged gap between what consumers reasonably expect from an opt-out and what technically occurred is why the $2.75 million settlement is significant: it’s described as the largest CCPA settlement to date and requires operational changes, not just a payment. Disney agreed to implement clearer “Do Not Sell or Share” style notices, an easier opt-out process, account-wide opt-outs for logged-in users across its streaming services, a way to confirm opt-out status, and ongoing compliance monitoring and reporting—key remedies under privacy enforcement because they change how the product works going forward. Broader implications extend beyond Disney because many companies have built opt-outs that function more like cookie/device settings than true account-level choices, and regulators are increasingly scrutinizing whether “global” signals like Global Privacy Control (GPC) are honored in a meaningful way. The CCPA (as amended by the CPRA) and enforcement expectations push businesses toward frictionless, conspicuous opt-outs and consistent treatment across platforms, especially when data sharing supports targeted advertising—an area where other major tech and media companies have faced similar complaints from regulators and plaintiffs. This settlement reinforces a growing compliance trend in streaming and ad-supported apps: opt-out rights must be implemented end-to-end across devices, services, and third-party integrations, not just presented as a checkbox that only partially works
Entities Involved
Related Topics
Eligibility Requirements
- Be a California resident
- Used a Disney streaming service (Disney+, Hulu, and/or ESPN+), app, or related online service
- Submitted a request to opt out of the sale or sharing of personal information (via toggle, webform, or Global Privacy Control)
- The opt-out request was not fully honored across all devices, services, or platforms associated with the user’s Disney account
Featured Investigations
Stay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest settlement updates and news.
Important Notice About Filing Claims
Submitting false information in a settlement claim is considered perjury and will result in your claim being rejected. Fraudulent claims harm legitimate class members and may result in legal consequences.
If you are unsure about your eligibility for this settlement, please visit the official settlement administrator’s website using the link provided above. Review the eligibility criteria carefully before submitting a claim.
Class Action Champion is an independent information resource and is not affiliated with any settlement administrator, law firm, or court. We provide settlement information as a service to help connect eligible class members with legitimate settlements.
Related Settlements
Anne Arundel Dermatology Data Breach Settlement $2.4 Million for Patient Info Security Claims
Anne Arundel Dermatology P.A. agreed to pay a $2.4 million settlement to resolve allegations that a data breach exposed patients’ personal and health information. The incident occurred between Feb. 14, 2025, and May 13, 2025. Eligible class members are people in the U.S. who provided or whose information the clinic collected, received, or possessed on or before Dec. 9, 2025.
Absolute Dental Group $3.3 Million Settlement for 2025 Data Breach Losses
Absolute Dental Group LLC agreed to pay a $3.3 million class action settlement over a potential 2025 data breach affecting consumers’ personal information. The incident occurred between Feb. 19, 2025 and March 5, 2025, when unauthorized access may have exposed data. Eligible U.S. residents who received notice from Absolute Dental about the incident may claim up to $5,000 for documented losses and may also receive a pro rata cash payment, with certain California residents eligible for an enhanced amount.
Travelers PIP Settlement for New Jersey Claims Up to 70 or More for Deductible Reductions
A class action settlement totaling at least the net settlement fund (with attorneys’ fees up to $275,000 and service awards of $7,500) resolves allegations that Travelers and St. Paul improperly reduced New Jersey PIP coverage limits by counting deductibles and copayments, causing some insureds to receive less than the PIP benefits available. Eligible policyholders (and certain heirs/representatives) who received final PIP payments between April 14, 2017 and April 1, 2023 that were within $3,000 of their policy limit—but not the full limit—may receive an automatic $70 and possibly additional compensation.
MUBI $1.6 Million Settlement for California Auto-Renewal Without Notice
California subscribers of the MUBI streaming service may be eligible for a $1.6 million class action settlement over alleged auto-renewal charges without adequate notice or proper consent. The claims cover sign-ups beginning April 1, 2021 and auto-renewals occurring through May 31, 2025, as described in Cesar Cejudo v. MUBI, Inc. To be eligible, claimants must have been California residents whose subscription renewed at least once and who did not receive a full refund of renewal charges.
