Criterion Channel 4.5M Settlement Over Alleged Video Viewing Privacy Violations
The Criterion Channel 4.5M Settlement Over Alleged Video Viewing Privacy Violations settlement offers $4.50M in total to eligible claimants who you are a u.s. resident (at a high level, as typical for this type of settlement) who used or subscribed to criterion channel. The filing deadline has not yet been announced. Proof of purchase is not required.
Deadline: No deadline specified
Total amount allocated for all claims
Estimated amount per eligible claim
No proof of purchase needed — anyone eligible can file a claim
The excerpt does not list specific documents. Claimants must complete the claim form on the official settlement website and certify the information is accurate under penalty of perjury; fraudulent or false information may result in rejection.
Settlement Summary
The Criterion Channel settlement stems from concerns about how streaming services handle viewing data—information about what titles you watch can reveal sensitive preferences and habits. In the U.S., the Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA) was created after a well-known privacy scandal involving video rental records and generally limits how “video tape service providers” disclose personally identifiable viewing information without proper consent; related federal privacy concepts also appear in laws like the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA), which governs certain interceptions and disclosures of electronic communications. The lawsuit alleged that Criterion Channel improperly disclosed subscribers’ video-viewing information to third parties, violating the VPPA (and potentially related privacy principles), and it resulted in a $4.5 million class action settlement. Cases like this matter because they test how older privacy statutes apply to modern streaming platforms, and they can push companies to tighten consent flows, tracking disclosures, and data-sharing practices with advertisers and analytics providers. Similar VPPA-based suits have been brought against other media and streaming companies over the use of tracking pixels or sharing identifiers linked to viewing behavior, signaling a broader industry shift toward clearer opt-in consent, more explicit privacy notices, and stricter controls on what user-level viewing data can be shared and for what purposes
Entities Involved
Related Topics
Eligibility Requirements
- You are a U.S. resident (at a high level, as typical for this type of settlement) who used or subscribed to Criterion Channel
- Your Criterion Channel video-viewing information was allegedly disclosed/shared during the settlement class period (exact dates not included in the provided text)
- You submit a timely claim through the official settlement website
- Your claim information is truthful and submitted under penalty of perjury (no fraudulent submissions)
Featured Investigations
Stay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest settlement updates and news.
Important Notice About Filing Claims
Submitting false information in a settlement claim is considered perjury and will result in your claim being rejected. Fraudulent claims harm legitimate class members and may result in legal consequences.
If you are unsure about your eligibility for this settlement, please visit the official settlement administrator’s website using the link provided above. Review the eligibility criteria carefully before submitting a claim.
Class Action Champion is an independent information resource and is not affiliated with any settlement administrator, law firm, or court. We provide settlement information as a service to help connect eligible class members with legitimate settlements.
Related Settlements
Anne Arundel Dermatology Data Breach Settlement $2.4 Million for Patient Info Security Claims
Anne Arundel Dermatology P.A. agreed to pay a $2.4 million settlement to resolve allegations that a data breach exposed patients’ personal and health information. The incident occurred between Feb. 14, 2025, and May 13, 2025. Eligible class members are people in the U.S. who provided or whose information the clinic collected, received, or possessed on or before Dec. 9, 2025.
Absolute Dental Group $3.3 Million Settlement for 2025 Data Breach Losses
Absolute Dental Group LLC agreed to pay a $3.3 million class action settlement over a potential 2025 data breach affecting consumers’ personal information. The incident occurred between Feb. 19, 2025 and March 5, 2025, when unauthorized access may have exposed data. Eligible U.S. residents who received notice from Absolute Dental about the incident may claim up to $5,000 for documented losses and may also receive a pro rata cash payment, with certain California residents eligible for an enhanced amount.
Travelers PIP Settlement for New Jersey Claims Up to 70 or More for Deductible Reductions
A class action settlement totaling at least the net settlement fund (with attorneys’ fees up to $275,000 and service awards of $7,500) resolves allegations that Travelers and St. Paul improperly reduced New Jersey PIP coverage limits by counting deductibles and copayments, causing some insureds to receive less than the PIP benefits available. Eligible policyholders (and certain heirs/representatives) who received final PIP payments between April 14, 2017 and April 1, 2023 that were within $3,000 of their policy limit—but not the full limit—may receive an automatic $70 and possibly additional compensation.
MUBI $1.6 Million Settlement for California Auto-Renewal Without Notice
California subscribers of the MUBI streaming service may be eligible for a $1.6 million class action settlement over alleged auto-renewal charges without adequate notice or proper consent. The claims cover sign-ups beginning April 1, 2021 and auto-renewals occurring through May 31, 2025, as described in Cesar Cejudo v. MUBI, Inc. To be eligible, claimants must have been California residents whose subscription renewed at least once and who did not receive a full refund of renewal charges.