Skip to main content
Back
Apr 1, 2026

Covetrus 70 Million Settlement Over Alleged Unfair 21 Per Share Buyout and Fiduciary Breaches

Settlement Image

The Covetrus 70 Million Settlement Over Alleged Unfair 21 Per Share Buyout and Fiduciary Breaches settlement offers $70M in total, with individual payouts of $1 to eligible claimants who be a record holder or beneficial owner of covetrus inc. common stock (nasdaq: cvet) whose shares were exchanged for $21 per share on oct. 13, 2022. The filing deadline has not yet been announced. Proof of purchase is not required.

Deadline
Pending

Deadline: No deadline specified

Total Settlement Amount
$70M

Total amount allocated for all claims

Individual Payout Range
$1

Estimated amount per eligible claim

Proof of Purchase
Not Required

No proof of purchase needed — anyone eligible can file a claim

No proof or claim form is required to receive a payout; eligible class members will be paid automatically in the same manner as the original transaction once the settlement is finally approved and appeals are resolved. Payments to street-name holders will be routed through DTCC participants and direct record holders will be paid directly; contact the settlement administrator for questions or to update payment/contact information.

Settlement Summary

This class action arises from Covetrus Inc.’s Oct. 13, 2022, $21-per-share cash buyout by affiliates of private equity firms (led by Clayton, Dubilier & Rice LLC and TPG), and it alleges that CD&R leveraged its position as a major stockholder and board member to force an unfair sale price and that defendants issued a materially misleading proxy. Plaintiffs sought damages for breaches of fiduciary duty and aiding and abetting those breaches; the parties agreed to a $70 million settlement (to be divided pro rata among eligible record and beneficial holders who exchanged shares for $21, after administration costs, taxes, and up to $14.7 million in fees and up to $20,000 in service awards). The class is certified solely for settlement under Delaware Chancery Court rules (a non‑opt‑out class), the claims were denied by defendants who settled to avoid litigation, and a fairness hearing is scheduled for April 13, 2026. Beyond the immediate payout, the case highlights recurring tensions when private equity sponsors that are also significant shareholders pursue take‑private deals: Delaware fiduciary law requires boards and controlling stockholders to secure fair value and full disclosure, and the SEC’s proxy rules demand accurate material information for voting stockholders. Similar suits frequently target potential conflicts of interest in sponsor-led buyouts and often end in settlements rather than definitive rulings, which can push acquirers and boards to strengthen sale processes and disclosures to reduce litigation risk and protect minority investors.

Entities Involved

Covetrus Inc.
Clayton, Dubilier & Rice LLC (CD&R)
TPG Global LLC
Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC)
Delaware Court of Chancery
Covetrus Stockholder Litigation (Settlement Administrator)
Nasdaq (CVET)

Related Topics

Covetrus settlement
Covetrus class action
Covetrus stock lawsuit
Clayton Dubilier & Rice settlement
CD&R shareholder lawsuit
TPG Global lawsuit
securities class action settlement
stockholder cash payout
$70 million settlement
shares exchanged $21 Oct 13 2022
Delaware Court of Chancery settlement
automatic settlement payment
Covetrus stockholder claim
fiduciary duty breach settlement

Eligibility Requirements

  • Be a record holder or beneficial owner of Covetrus Inc. common stock (Nasdaq: CVET) whose shares were exchanged for $21 per share on Oct. 13, 2022
  • Includes individuals and entities, as well as heirs, successors in interest, transferees and assigns
  • Shares held directly (record holder) or in “street name” (through brokers/DTCC) are eligible
  • Class is certified for settlement purposes only and is a non-opt-out class (members cannot exclude themselves)
  • No claim form or separate documentation required to receive payment

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest settlement updates and news.

Important Notice About Filing Claims

Submitting false information in a settlement claim is considered perjury and will result in your claim being rejected. Fraudulent claims harm legitimate class members and may result in legal consequences.

If you are unsure about your eligibility for this settlement, please visit the official settlement administrator’s website using the link provided above. Review the eligibility criteria carefully before submitting a claim.

Class Action Champion is an independent information resource and is not affiliated with any settlement administrator, law firm, or court. We provide settlement information as a service to help connect eligible class members with legitimate settlements.

Related Settlements

Anne Arundel Dermatology Data Breach Settlement $2.4 Million for Patient Info Security Claims

Anne Arundel Dermatology P.A. agreed to pay a $2.4 million settlement to resolve allegations that a data breach exposed patients’ personal and health information. The incident occurred between Feb. 14, 2025, and May 13, 2025. Eligible class members are people in the U.S. who provided or whose information the clinic collected, received, or possessed on or before Dec. 9, 2025.

Travelers PIP Settlement for New Jersey Claims Up to 70 or More for Deductible Reductions

A class action settlement totaling at least the net settlement fund (with attorneys’ fees up to $275,000 and service awards of $7,500) resolves allegations that Travelers and St. Paul improperly reduced New Jersey PIP coverage limits by counting deductibles and copayments, causing some insureds to receive less than the PIP benefits available. Eligible policyholders (and certain heirs/representatives) who received final PIP payments between April 14, 2017 and April 1, 2023 that were within $3,000 of their policy limit—but not the full limit—may receive an automatic $70 and possibly additional compensation.

MUBI $1.6 Million Settlement for California Auto-Renewal Without Notice

California subscribers of the MUBI streaming service may be eligible for a $1.6 million class action settlement over alleged auto-renewal charges without adequate notice or proper consent. The claims cover sign-ups beginning April 1, 2021 and auto-renewals occurring through May 31, 2025, as described in Cesar Cejudo v. MUBI, Inc. To be eligible, claimants must have been California residents whose subscription renewed at least once and who did not receive a full refund of renewal charges.

MetLife $1.2 Million Settlement for Underinsured Motorist Coverage Offsets in New Mexico

Metropolitan Direct Property and Casualty Insurance Co. (MetLife) agreed to pay $1.2 million to settle claims that it misrepresented or failed to disclose underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) coverage limits and used improper offsets. The issue relates to New Mexico auto insurance activity between Oct. 1, 2010, and Jan. 31, 2022. Eligible class members include qualifying policyholders who had UM/UIM claim offsets by at-fault payments or who purchased UM/UIM coverage in that period.