Skip to main content
Back
Jun 7, 2026

Colgate-Palmolive and Tom's of Maine $2.9M Settlement for Deceptive Toothpaste Marketing

Settlement Image

The Colgate-Palmolive and Tom's of Maine $2.9M Settlement for Deceptive Toothpaste Marketing settlement offers $2.90M in total to eligible claimants who be a u.s. consumer. The deadline to file is July 6, 2026. Proof of purchase is not required.

Deadline
6 days remaining

Deadline: July 6, 2026

Total Settlement Amount
$2.90M

Total amount allocated for all claims

Individual Payout Range
TBD

Estimated amount per eligible claim

Proof of Purchase
Not Required

No proof of purchase needed — anyone eligible can file a claim

Claims may be submitted without proof using an average MSRP for 1 product per household. Claims with proof may receive a full refund for up to 3 products. Documentation is intended to show purchase of Tom’s of Maine toothpaste during the class period (e.g., proof of purchase/receipts) for refund amounts that require proof.

Settlement Summary

In a recently approved consumer class action, Colgate-Palmolive and its subsidiary Tom’s of Maine faced allegations that Tom’s of Maine toothpaste was marketed in a deceptive way, tied to events following an FDA inspection of the company’s Sanford, Maine facility. The case—*Rabinowitz et al. v. Colgate-Palmolive Company et al.*, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York—concerns whether consumers were misled through product claims made on toothpaste labels or advertisements. Under the proposed settlement, eligible U.S. buyers who purchased Tom’s of Maine toothpaste during the class period (November 21, 2020 through March 6, 2026) may receive compensation, with the process designed to be relatively simple: some claimants can qualify without proof using an average MSRP amount, while others can receive a full refund for up to three products if they can substantiate purchases. The lawsuit was filed to challenge potentially misleading marketing practices and to hold the companies accountable through a class-wide remedy rather than individual suits. Its significance lies in the $2.9 million settlement fund, which reflects the risks companies face when marketing claims are scrutinized—especially after regulatory attention such as FDA inspections. More broadly, cases like this are part of an ongoing pattern in consumer protection and “false advertising” litigation, where plaintiffs often argue that health-related product representations may influence purchasing decisions and expectations. In the oral care and broader FDA-regulated consumer products industry, manufacturers must ensure that toothpaste claims comply with applicable laws and regulations—particularly those governing truthful, non-misleading statements—so settlements like this can signal that advertising and labeling strategies may need to be closely aligned with regulatory scrutiny, consumer expectations, and enforcement priorities, as the claims move toward final approval in September 2026.

Entities Involved

ToothpasteSettlement.com
Colgate-Palmolive Company
Tom's of Maine Inc.
Rabinowitz et al. v. Colgate-Palmolive Company et al.
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
Hon. James M. Wicks
The Wright Law Office P.A.
Denlea & Carton LLP
Wilshire Law Firm PLC
Central Islip Courthouse
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
Sanford, Maine facility
Tom's of Maine toothpaste

Related Topics

Tom's of Maine toothpaste settlement
toothpaste class action
FDA inspection deceptive marketing
Colgate-Palmolive settlement
Tom's of Maine settlement claim
Rabinowitz v. Colgate-Palmolive
toothpaste refund class action
consumer settlement notice PDF
ToothpasteSettlement.com
class action settlement deadline July 6 2026
file a claim toothpaste settlement
no proof claim average MSRP
proof required full refund up to 3
U.S. consumers purchased toothpaste class period

Eligibility Requirements

  • Be a U.S. consumer
  • Purchased Tom’s of Maine toothpaste between November 21, 2020 and March 6, 2026
  • Submit a valid claim by the claim deadline (July 6, 2026)

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest settlement updates and news.

Important Notice About Filing Claims

Submitting false information in a settlement claim is considered perjury and will result in your claim being rejected. Fraudulent claims harm legitimate class members and may result in legal consequences.

If you are unsure about your eligibility for this settlement, please visit the official settlement administrator’s website using the link provided above. Review the eligibility criteria carefully before submitting a claim.

Class Action Champion is an independent information resource and is not affiliated with any settlement administrator, law firm, or court. We provide settlement information as a service to help connect eligible class members with legitimate settlements.

Related Settlements

Absolute Dental Group $3.3 Million Settlement for 2025 Data Breach Losses

Absolute Dental Group LLC agreed to pay a $3.3 million class action settlement over a potential 2025 data breach affecting consumers’ personal information. The incident occurred between Feb. 19, 2025 and March 5, 2025, when unauthorized access may have exposed data. Eligible U.S. residents who received notice from Absolute Dental about the incident may claim up to $5,000 for documented losses and may also receive a pro rata cash payment, with certain California residents eligible for an enhanced amount.

Travelers PIP Settlement for New Jersey Claims Up to 70 or More for Deductible Reductions

A class action settlement totaling at least the net settlement fund (with attorneys’ fees up to $275,000 and service awards of $7,500) resolves allegations that Travelers and St. Paul improperly reduced New Jersey PIP coverage limits by counting deductibles and copayments, causing some insureds to receive less than the PIP benefits available. Eligible policyholders (and certain heirs/representatives) who received final PIP payments between April 14, 2017 and April 1, 2023 that were within $3,000 of their policy limit—but not the full limit—may receive an automatic $70 and possibly additional compensation.

MUBI $1.6 Million Settlement for California Auto-Renewal Without Notice

California subscribers of the MUBI streaming service may be eligible for a $1.6 million class action settlement over alleged auto-renewal charges without adequate notice or proper consent. The claims cover sign-ups beginning April 1, 2021 and auto-renewals occurring through May 31, 2025, as described in Cesar Cejudo v. MUBI, Inc. To be eligible, claimants must have been California residents whose subscription renewed at least once and who did not receive a full refund of renewal charges.

MetLife $1.2 Million Settlement for Underinsured Motorist Coverage Offsets in New Mexico

Metropolitan Direct Property and Casualty Insurance Co. (MetLife) agreed to pay $1.2 million to settle claims that it misrepresented or failed to disclose underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) coverage limits and used improper offsets. The issue relates to New Mexico auto insurance activity between Oct. 1, 2010, and Jan. 31, 2022. Eligible class members include qualifying policyholders who had UM/UIM claim offsets by at-fault payments or who purchased UM/UIM coverage in that period.