AGC America Data Breach Settlement Offers 50 to 2,500 for Exposed Info

The AGC America Data Breach Settlement Offers 50 to 2,500 for Exposed Info settlement, with individual payouts of $50 to $2.50K to eligible claimants who your personal information was compromised in the december 2023 agc america data breach.. The deadline to file is July 15, 2026. Proof of purchase is not required.
Deadline: July 15, 2026
Total amount allocated for all claims
Estimated amount per eligible claim
No proof of purchase needed — anyone eligible can file a claim
No proof is required to submit a claim (proof_required: No).
Settlement Summary
In December 2023, AGC America—an international glass and materials company—suffered a data breach in which certain customers’ and employees’ personal information was reportedly exposed. According to the settlement website, affected individuals may now be eligible for compensation ranging from $50 to $2,500, depending on what information was compromised. Class action settlements like this are common in the wake of cyber incidents because they consolidate many similar claims into one process, making it easier for impacted people to seek relief without having to file individual lawsuits. The lawsuit was filed to address allegations that AGC America failed to adequately protect sensitive data and to hold the company accountable for the resulting risk, potential misuse, and administrative burdens faced by affected individuals. Its significance is that it offers a structured, faster way for people to receive payments—no proof may be required for inclusion on the settlement terms shown—while also putting pressure on organizations to strengthen cybersecurity practices. More broadly, this fits an ongoing pattern in the industry: businesses across healthcare, retail, finance, and manufacturing have faced waves of class actions following breaches, and regulators such as the Federal Trade Commission have increasingly emphasized “reasonable” data security under laws like the FTC Act, alongside sector-specific rules and state privacy statutes that require appropriate safeguards and, in many cases, breach notification. Industry context matters because companies handling consumer or employee data often must follow a patchwork of U.S. state breach-notification laws, adopt recognized security frameworks, and maintain incident-response plans that can withstand scrutiny. Similar cases and settlements frequently focus on whether a company’s security controls—such as encryption, access management, monitoring, and patching—were sufficient to prevent or quickly contain unauthorized access, and whether the breach disclosures were timely and complete. This settlement is one more example of how data-breach litigation is reshaping cybersecurity expectations and consumer protections, offering affected individuals monetary relief while reinforcing the idea that protecting personal data is a core business obligation that can carry legal consequences when it fails
Entities Involved
Related Topics
Eligibility Requirements
- Your personal information was compromised in the December 2023 AGC America data breach.
Featured Investigations
Stay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest settlement updates and news.
Important Notice About Filing Claims
Submitting false information in a settlement claim is considered perjury and will result in your claim being rejected. Fraudulent claims harm legitimate class members and may result in legal consequences.
If you are unsure about your eligibility for this settlement, please visit the official settlement administrator’s website using the link provided above. Review the eligibility criteria carefully before submitting a claim.
Class Action Champion is an independent information resource and is not affiliated with any settlement administrator, law firm, or court. We provide settlement information as a service to help connect eligible class members with legitimate settlements.
Related Settlements
Anne Arundel Dermatology Data Breach Settlement $2.4 Million for Patient Info Security Claims
Anne Arundel Dermatology P.A. agreed to pay a $2.4 million settlement to resolve allegations that a data breach exposed patients’ personal and health information. The incident occurred between Feb. 14, 2025, and May 13, 2025. Eligible class members are people in the U.S. who provided or whose information the clinic collected, received, or possessed on or before Dec. 9, 2025.
Absolute Dental Group $3.3 Million Settlement for 2025 Data Breach Losses
Absolute Dental Group LLC agreed to pay a $3.3 million class action settlement over a potential 2025 data breach affecting consumers’ personal information. The incident occurred between Feb. 19, 2025 and March 5, 2025, when unauthorized access may have exposed data. Eligible U.S. residents who received notice from Absolute Dental about the incident may claim up to $5,000 for documented losses and may also receive a pro rata cash payment, with certain California residents eligible for an enhanced amount.
Travelers PIP Settlement for New Jersey Claims Up to 70 or More for Deductible Reductions
A class action settlement totaling at least the net settlement fund (with attorneys’ fees up to $275,000 and service awards of $7,500) resolves allegations that Travelers and St. Paul improperly reduced New Jersey PIP coverage limits by counting deductibles and copayments, causing some insureds to receive less than the PIP benefits available. Eligible policyholders (and certain heirs/representatives) who received final PIP payments between April 14, 2017 and April 1, 2023 that were within $3,000 of their policy limit—but not the full limit—may receive an automatic $70 and possibly additional compensation.
MUBI $1.6 Million Settlement for California Auto-Renewal Without Notice
California subscribers of the MUBI streaming service may be eligible for a $1.6 million class action settlement over alleged auto-renewal charges without adequate notice or proper consent. The claims cover sign-ups beginning April 1, 2021 and auto-renewals occurring through May 31, 2025, as described in Cesar Cejudo v. MUBI, Inc. To be eligible, claimants must have been California residents whose subscription renewed at least once and who did not receive a full refund of renewal charges.
