Skip to main content
Back
May 2, 2026

80/20 Inc ESOP $7 Million Settlement for Improper Termination Payments

Settlement Image

The 80/20 Inc ESOP $7 Million Settlement for Improper Termination Payments settlement offers $7M in total to eligible claimants who be a participant in the 80/20 inc. employee stock ownership plan at the time the plan was terminated. The deadline to file is July 14, 2026. Proof of purchase is not required.

Deadline
64 days remaining

Deadline: July 14, 2026

Total Settlement Amount
$7M

Total amount allocated for all claims

Individual Payout Range
TBD

Estimated amount per eligible claim

Proof of Purchase
Not Required

No proof of purchase needed — anyone eligible can file a claim

No claim form is required to receive payment. The settlement administrator will mail checks based on the last known address for eligible class members; alternatively, eligible recipients can submit rollover or EFT forms by July 14, 2026. Proof is primarily established through the plan records identifying class members and, for beneficiaries/alternate payees, documentation reflected in the plan (such as a QDRO or other payee designation on record).

Settlement Summary

80/20 Inc. sponsors an employee stock ownership plan (ESOP), a retirement vehicle designed to hold company stock for employees and distribute benefits according to plan rules. When the company terminated the ESOP, some participants received “termination distributions,” but a class action lawsuit alleged that the ESOP was administered and terminated improperly—specifically claiming violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), the main U.S. law that governs how employer-sponsored retirement plans are managed, documented, and paid out. The settlement notice says there are 328 eligible class members identified from plan records, including beneficiaries or alternate payees (for example, people entitled under a qualified domestic relations order) tied to participants who received termination distributions. The lawsuit was filed to challenge how plan administrators handled the termination payments and to recover damages for affected participants; its significance is that it resolves those allegations through a defined $7,000,000 settlement fund. After court-approved deductions for attorneys’ fees, administration, expenses, and service awards for class representatives, the remaining “net settlement” will be divided pro rata—meaning each class member’s payout depends on the size of the termination distribution they received compared with others. Importantly, eligible people generally do not need to file a claim because checks will be mailed to last known addresses, though participants can also select options like a direct rollover to an IRA/qualified plan or an electronic funds transfer, reflecting how settlements involving retirement plan assets often intersect with federal tax handling and ERISA’s protective framework. Similar ESOP and other ERISA-related class actions have broader implications for employers and plan fiduciaries: they underscore that, during major plan events like termination or payout, administrators must follow ERISA’s fiduciary and procedural requirements or face collective claims that can result in costly settlements and corrective oversight.

Entities Involved

80/20 Inc.
80/20 Inc. employee stock ownership plan (ESOP)
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA)
Settlement administrator
Class representatives
IRA (individual retirement account)
Qualified employer plan
Qualified domestic relations order (QDRO)
8020erisasettlement.com (referenced settlement website/portal)

Related Topics

80/20 Inc ESOP settlement
ERISA ESOP lawsuit settlement
employee stock ownership plan termination payout
ESOP termination distribution claim
class action ERISA settlement
80/20 ESOP cash payment
direct rollover IRA ESOP settlement
electronic funds transfer EFT ESOP settlement
settlement administrator pro rata distribution
ESOP beneficiaries alternate payee settlement
qualified domestic relations order QDRO ESOP payout
class notice 80/20 ESOP
July 14 2026 ESOP settlement deadline
attorneys fees administrative costs service awards settlement

Eligibility Requirements

  • Be a participant in the 80/20 Inc. employee stock ownership plan at the time the plan was terminated
  • Received a termination distribution from the ESOP upon termination
  • If applicable, be a beneficiary or alternate payee of record tied to the participant (e.g., via a qualified domestic relations order)

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest settlement updates and news.

Important Notice About Filing Claims

Submitting false information in a settlement claim is considered perjury and will result in your claim being rejected. Fraudulent claims harm legitimate class members and may result in legal consequences.

If you are unsure about your eligibility for this settlement, please visit the official settlement administrator’s website using the link provided above. Review the eligibility criteria carefully before submitting a claim.

Class Action Champion is an independent information resource and is not affiliated with any settlement administrator, law firm, or court. We provide settlement information as a service to help connect eligible class members with legitimate settlements.

Related Settlements

Anne Arundel Dermatology Data Breach Settlement $2.4 Million for Patient Info Security Claims

Anne Arundel Dermatology P.A. agreed to pay a $2.4 million settlement to resolve allegations that a data breach exposed patients’ personal and health information. The incident occurred between Feb. 14, 2025, and May 13, 2025. Eligible class members are people in the U.S. who provided or whose information the clinic collected, received, or possessed on or before Dec. 9, 2025.

Travelers PIP Settlement for New Jersey Claims Up to 70 or More for Deductible Reductions

A class action settlement totaling at least the net settlement fund (with attorneys’ fees up to $275,000 and service awards of $7,500) resolves allegations that Travelers and St. Paul improperly reduced New Jersey PIP coverage limits by counting deductibles and copayments, causing some insureds to receive less than the PIP benefits available. Eligible policyholders (and certain heirs/representatives) who received final PIP payments between April 14, 2017 and April 1, 2023 that were within $3,000 of their policy limit—but not the full limit—may receive an automatic $70 and possibly additional compensation.

MUBI $1.6 Million Settlement for California Auto-Renewal Without Notice

California subscribers of the MUBI streaming service may be eligible for a $1.6 million class action settlement over alleged auto-renewal charges without adequate notice or proper consent. The claims cover sign-ups beginning April 1, 2021 and auto-renewals occurring through May 31, 2025, as described in Cesar Cejudo v. MUBI, Inc. To be eligible, claimants must have been California residents whose subscription renewed at least once and who did not receive a full refund of renewal charges.

MetLife $1.2 Million Settlement for Underinsured Motorist Coverage Offsets in New Mexico

Metropolitan Direct Property and Casualty Insurance Co. (MetLife) agreed to pay $1.2 million to settle claims that it misrepresented or failed to disclose underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) coverage limits and used improper offsets. The issue relates to New Mexico auto insurance activity between Oct. 1, 2010, and Jan. 31, 2022. Eligible class members include qualifying policyholders who had UM/UIM claim offsets by at-fault payments or who purchased UM/UIM coverage in that period.