Skip to main content
Back
May 16, 2026

ACV Auctions Settlement Pays $1,722.43 to $5,000 for Washington Job Posting Wage Info Violation

Settlement Image

The ACV Auctions Settlement Pays $1,722.43 to $5,000 for Washington Job Posting Wage Info Violation settlement offers $2.70M in total, with individual payouts of $1.72K to $5K to eligible claimants who applied for a job with acv auctions, acv capital, or acv transportation in washington between jan. 1, 2023, and july 26, 2025.. The deadline to file is June 29, 2026. Proof of purchase is required.

Deadline
1 days remaining

Deadline: June 29, 2026

Total Settlement Amount
$2.70M

Total amount allocated for all claims

Individual Payout Range
$1.72K to $5K

Estimated amount per eligible claim

Proof of Purchase
Required

To submit a claim, provide the notice ID and PIN from the settlement notice. No additional supporting documentation is described in the provided text; the settlement administrator determines eligibility and the final pro rata payment based on the number of valid claims filed.

Settlement Summary

The lawsuit stems from Washington State’s pay transparency requirements, which generally require employers advertising jobs in the state to include specific wage and—depending on the situation—benefits or other compensation information in the job posting. According to the settlement notice, people who applied for positions at ACV Auctions, ACV Capital, or ACV Transportation in Washington between Jan. 1, 2023, and July 26, 2025 may be eligible for a cash payment if the role’s listing did not disclose a wage scale/salary range and/or a general benefits/compensation description. The proposed settlement covers 1,080 applicants and sets expected payments of roughly $1,722.43 to $5,000 on a pro rata basis, meaning the final amount depends on how many valid claims are submitted. The case was filed to challenge how ACV presented job information to applicants and to give affected candidates a way to recover money for alleged violations. Even though ACV denies wrongdoing, the companies agreed to settle—an outcome that helps avoid the cost and uncertainty of continued litigation while still providing potential relief to class members. Broader implications include increased pressure on employers to comply with Washington’s wage transparency rules and similar laws in other jurisdictions, and it mirrors a growing pattern of employment and consumer-style class actions targeting allegedly noncompliant job postings, where job applicants argue they were deprived of the information they were legally entitled to see before applying.

Entities Involved

ACV Auctions Inc.
ACV Capital LLC
ACV Transportation LLC
Hill v. ACV Auctions Inc., et al.
Simpluris
EPOASettlementACVACT.com
EPOA Settlement (website/administrator reference)

Related Topics

ACV Auctions class action
ACV Capital settlement
ACV Transportation wage disclosure
Washington job posting wage range lawsuit
required salary range class action
benefits disclosure violation Washington
employment wage transparency settlement
Hill v. ACV Auctions Simpluris
EPOASettlementACVACT claim
online claim settlement notice ID PIN
Seattle remote job posting wage scale
Washington State wage and benefits law
estimated settlement payment $1722
June 29 2026 class action deadline
ACV job applicants eligibility

Eligibility Requirements

  • Applied for a job with ACV Auctions, ACV Capital, or ACV Transportation in Washington between Jan. 1, 2023, and July 26, 2025.
  • The job application was for either (a) a remote position listing Seattle and/or Washington as a location, or (b) a job opening located in Washington state.
  • The job posting did not disclose a wage scale or salary range and did not include a general description of benefits and/or other compensation as required by Washington law.
  • Submit a valid claim by the deadline using the notice ID and PIN from the settlement notice received.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest settlement updates and news.

Important Notice About Filing Claims

Submitting false information in a settlement claim is considered perjury and will result in your claim being rejected. Fraudulent claims harm legitimate class members and may result in legal consequences.

If you are unsure about your eligibility for this settlement, please visit the official settlement administrator’s website using the link provided above. Review the eligibility criteria carefully before submitting a claim.

Class Action Champion is an independent information resource and is not affiliated with any settlement administrator, law firm, or court. We provide settlement information as a service to help connect eligible class members with legitimate settlements.

Related Settlements

Anne Arundel Dermatology Data Breach Settlement $2.4 Million for Patient Info Security Claims

Anne Arundel Dermatology P.A. agreed to pay a $2.4 million settlement to resolve allegations that a data breach exposed patients’ personal and health information. The incident occurred between Feb. 14, 2025, and May 13, 2025. Eligible class members are people in the U.S. who provided or whose information the clinic collected, received, or possessed on or before Dec. 9, 2025.

Absolute Dental Group $3.3 Million Settlement for 2025 Data Breach Losses

Absolute Dental Group LLC agreed to pay a $3.3 million class action settlement over a potential 2025 data breach affecting consumers’ personal information. The incident occurred between Feb. 19, 2025 and March 5, 2025, when unauthorized access may have exposed data. Eligible U.S. residents who received notice from Absolute Dental about the incident may claim up to $5,000 for documented losses and may also receive a pro rata cash payment, with certain California residents eligible for an enhanced amount.

MUBI $1.6 Million Settlement for California Auto-Renewal Without Notice

California subscribers of the MUBI streaming service may be eligible for a $1.6 million class action settlement over alleged auto-renewal charges without adequate notice or proper consent. The claims cover sign-ups beginning April 1, 2021 and auto-renewals occurring through May 31, 2025, as described in Cesar Cejudo v. MUBI, Inc. To be eligible, claimants must have been California residents whose subscription renewed at least once and who did not receive a full refund of renewal charges.

NextEra Energy ERISA 401k Settlement $8 Million for Excess Fees and Forfeitures

NextEra Energy has agreed to pay an $8 million settlement to resolve an ERISA class action alleging fiduciary breaches tied to its employee retirement savings plan. The claims focus on alleged excessive administrative fees and the improper use of plan forfeitures to offset employer matching contributions instead of paying plan expenses. The alleged conduct relates to the period from September 25, 2017, through March 17, 2026. Eligible class members are current or former plan participants during that window, including certain beneficiaries and QDRO alternate payees.